But it isn't absolutely "subjective", it is based on observation and data.Which is absolutely subjective.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
But it isn't absolutely "subjective", it is based on observation and data.Which is absolutely subjective.
Modern xG models do that.It isn't. It's a load of utter bollocks that completely fails to account for the multiple variables.
You've convinced me, although the indicators of long term form are not mathematical - we watch it today.xG isn't designed to predict single match outcomes, it's designed to show the likelihood of scoring each individual shot. In aggregate over several matches, it is one of the most reliable indicators of long-term form available.
If you flip a coin and get heads twice, it doesn't mean that the odds that you'd get tails 1/2 times was wrong - you just happened to get heads twice.
It's subjective, unless there's tech that knows what is going on in the mind of the players.But it isn't absolutely "subjective", it is based on observation and data.
It's subjective, unless there's tech that knows what is going on in the mind of the players.
Modern xG models do that.
Again, it's not predicting whether a goal will go in - it's predicting the probability that it will.
Oh fuck off you halfwit half-fan millennial wanker.
Okay, pal.Oh fuck off you halfwit half-fan millennial wanker.
Okay, pal.
City uses high pressure from the start. Takes a lot of effort.Pep has shown he can protect weak CBs by dominating possession.
The pod is only worth listening to if you are 12. Or under.
Nope. That is shit too.TBF there's 2 pods the main FC one is a bit puerile but the Extra inch with Windy Nathan and Bardi is much more tactical and really good!
FIXED!I’ve literally just cancelled my Sky subscription.Was due toWill renew next week.
20 shots at goal, 16 off target is fucking diabolical. They had a 100% shots to shots on target rate, we had a 20% success rate. For our quality even away from Kane and Son it simply wasn’t acceptable.
I wonder what the worst success rate of shots on target to shots had in a game is, we won’t the be far off apart from the shit teams that end up having a few shots a match and missing all of them, teams like Swindon and Bradford etc.
20% return on testing the goalkeeper is fucking poxy and I don’t think that even includes blocked shots of which we had a fair few.