We will have finances if Kane is sold along with some of the dead wood... for Conte to use. Surely he already knows the score with our budgeting. We'd get over 200 million for Kane Ndomble, GLC.
Conte won't want us to sell Kane though
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
We will have finances if Kane is sold along with some of the dead wood... for Conte to use. Surely he already knows the score with our budgeting. We'd get over 200 million for Kane Ndomble, GLC.
Basically saying I have no fucking clue, I'm just waiting for someone to post something reliable so I can steal it and keep my reputation...
At least we're not getting Sarri....
Of course not but I think Kane wants to go. Even selling Winks, Aurier and the other useless cnts is going to bring in some money for Conte to play with. He won't need extra mega bucks if we sell well.
The idea of the manager as the absolute final word on his squad is an antiquated notion in 2021.
City or Liverpool would both place a lot of trust in Pep or Klopp's opinion on a transfer and would obviously be loathe to piss off their golden goose managers, but at the end of the day those are well-run clubs because they think beyond one manager as the be-all, end-all of the club.
That's the thing they've got footballing decisions made by people who have an understanding of the game Mike Edwards and the ex Barcelona dudes, Txiki and Ferran Sorriano.The idea of the manager as the absolute final word on his squad is an antiquated notion in 2021.
City or Liverpool would both place a lot of trust in Pep or Klopp's opinion on a transfer and would obviously be loathe to piss off their golden goose managers, but at the end of the day those are well-run clubs because they think beyond one manager as the be-all, end-all of the club.
I'm not saying you are wrong, or well I am, at least I think you are wrong. What I said in my last post is that you can not know this, it's a guess not factWhich ones do you believe we're asked for by gaffers. Ndombele wasn't Poch's choice. Lo Celso was a compromise because we could get him on loan with option to buy at a discounted price. Doherty was a compromise because Aurier was crap and Levy said you have a small budget. Seas was a compromise because we needed a left back and he was young enough to be profitable. Clarke was similar to Seas. Bergwjin, Bale, Rodon and Vini are all Levy and his troops choices. Granted Hart and Fernandes were Jose stuff ups. But majority of the players are bought to fill a gap.
Its the reason, I believe, we will not easily see Conti running our team. He believes he should be allowed what he needs to do his job. Same applies for Zidane, Ancelloti, Pep..... Etc. We will never have serial Trophy winners succeed because we have a chairman who wants to choose the manager, decide who his players must be, decide which players get to play, decide if they can or not be sold, I won't be surprised if he decides what underwater they must wear.
I don't see how he fits with the spiel about a manager in keeping with our traditions etc. All that points to Poch or a relatively inexperienced manager with a reputation for good football e.g. Potter.I also think Conte might/would make a better player out of Docherty, get Ali back on form, replace Ndomeble for a player of similar value but one that is more consistent at being good.
Nah, I'm not really one for the sob story that everything is shit. With a decent coach, we could've been in the fight for the top 4 this year. With a few changes to the squad and that decent coach, we would be right back in the top 4. The Spurs fanbase is a bit overly emotional right now, and that's leading to a lot of imposed narrative getting ahead of the facts.Fit right in with us then. Unless we sign a few good defenders there's no point even trying to polish a turd like Mourinho did. Right now we've sunk so low I'll take us just attacking and playing with the freedom we used to. Anything on top of that will just be a bonus.
I agree but I don’t think they have a bottomless pit of money like Man City or Chelsea. So the situation is a different for Everton.Toss around money aimlessly for long enough and you figure it out. Every one of the big spending projects now dominating the game started out wasting money on bad players.
Begiristain was hired there in 2012. He hired Manuel Pellegrini and won a title before landing Pep.City is a terrible example - they hired their DoF and technical director purely to get Guardiola to join
They set everything up specifically for the manager
They just signed Alaba from Bayern on a free transfer so that's left back sorted with Mendy and Marcelo still at the club. They won't be buying Reguilon backWonder if Ancelotti going back to Madrid impacts a potential return for Bale, and Reguilon having the buyback clause in his move?
Why would the Juve guy leave with Conte. They don't follow each other everywhere. If he does a good job here and is happy and Levy happy with him then he will stay even if Conte leavesBegiristain was hired there in 2012. He hired Manuel Pellegrini and won a title before landing Pep.
The whole thing was built in the image of Pep's Barca of course, and he was always a target as the manager, but there is a bigger structure in place than just Pep, that will last whenever he goes.
Contrast with the Juventus guy that has been rumored with Conte. The two of them would arrive at Spurs together and beyond any doubt whatsoever would leave Spurs together, unless of course the Juventus guy left even earlier. Calling someone like that a "Director of Football" is a misnomer.