But how many clubs were doped with money before ENIC and how many money doped clubs did we lose domestic finals to? Its not just "we won X before and now we didnt so we are worse off now", there are other factors at play too.
To me its quite obvious that we are in a better place as a club now than we were 20 years ago, titles or no titles, but I couldnt tell you if it is thanks to ENIC or despite them.
I do however agree that we could have been even better off, had we not gone 18 months with no signing. Hopefully Levy learned alot from that.
If you could choose between debt for the best stadium in the world that all but guarantees us a stead income or a highly talented first team squad that will win things fairly often but be volatile financially, which would you choose?
Don't buy into the FFP thing, it seems to only hurt some teams sometimes.