Oh I agree there. Gvardiol would be a better and not as risky choice especially since we play a back three but 80 mil for a 20 yr old after 1 good season is tough.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer 2022 Transfer Thread.
- Thread starter Darnswim 🇦🇱
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Deleted member 15314
Guest
What are the chances Gvardiol costs more than 80m even if he has a good world cup and a good season in the league/Europe again?
Not high.
Knowing Levy it ends up being 50 up front and the rest scaled.
The guy helps us qual for CL again and that covers the rest, anyway.
First time I've been genuinely excited this window, since Bastoni links.
Last edited:
Yes I agree and said something seemed odd a week or 10 days ago.
Spurs aren’t signing an 80 million CB.
Conte might say different.
His agent said in one of the our podcasts that Leipzig refused 60M last summer. So it’s true.
He’s gonna be absolute monster. 80 for him and 60 for Richarlison and COYS
I don’t think it’s going to be 60m for Richarlison. Everton need to sell by June 30th and after 40m have to pay Watford 10%. I think they might be motivated to make some deal.
Not a chance.
lol such nonsense, anyway.
Indeed.
If we’re essentially sending winks (15-20) and moura (tougher to gauge for me- but let’s say 15)….we can say maybe another 20 for Richarlison?
We pay up front and these 2 leave after July 1.
For arguments’ sake that would be 20 mil for Richarlison. We’d have saved a ton of cash here.
Maybe we are in for Raphina as well. I highly doubt it, but one could dream
Had a stinker against rangers by all accounts
Why not! We're the financial juggernaut of the Premier League now, ain't we?
Deleted member 15314
Guest
I'd rather try with someone like Lisandro Martinez, Hincapie etc. and if that doesn't work try again next year, rather than spunking 80m on one player, who won't be good value anything short of world class season, and if he flops we're left holding the bag.
Already been chewed over in the Rich' thread..... They're not gonna bin off 10-15m to void paying Watford 2-4m.
Sherlock, that you?
That’s also true if they both stay…
Have you heard for Lisandro Martinez two weeks ago?
I’m not saying Gvardiol costs 80M. But Liverpool payed 100M for a kid from Benfica. That’s football nowadays. I would rather buy Gvardiol for 80 than get Torres for 50 or Lenglet on loan. He’s 20 and already really good. I don’t want to see him in Chelsea in two years and regret why didn’t we pull the trigger.
Deleted member 15314
Guest
Yes. I followed Argentina quite closely from around the time we were linked with Lo Celso or maybe when Foyth got his chance at RB. Check my posts, I was pretty much the first one here to back Romero.
Even though he didn't play a lot, there was a bit of buzz around Martinez too. They think him and Romero will be the go to CB partnership of Argentina going forward.
I have my reservations about him, but if he turns out to be another Davinson Sanchez we won't be stuck with another Ndombele/Lo Celso situation. We're not yet City/United, we can't afford such a big blunder.