We play with two, solid midfielders - based on last season there’s no place for an attacking midfielder
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer 2022 Transfer Thread.
- Thread starter Darnswim 🇦🇱
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
I don’t think Conte wants to play an attacking midfielder. In his tactical ideal Kane drops back to be that creative centre, or the wingbacks have the responsibility, or Son and Kulu do their thing. Gone is the day where everything comes through one playmaker like Xavi or Eriksen.
Conte did say this though:
Conte wants star striker Kane to focus on being the number nine
Kane is up there with Kevin De Bruyne and Trent Alexander-Arnold for his passing ability, but Conte wants to see him concentrate on his more traditional role and a new creative player arriving.
We need that Romero equivalent on the left, Bremmer isn't that guy.
No more news on Illya Zabarnyi? He’s obviously for the future but sounds a real talent
I'm alright with the no buy option. It's clear our first two choices were Bastoni and Gvardiol, and if they aren't available this summer then getting in a stop gap for now is smart business.
Barca may not have wanted to commit to an option. If he turns out to be amazing, then we know Barca are desperate to sell at the moment so we'd likely get a deal sorted either way.
Time to move onto Spence and then look at a midfielder and potentially another attack.
Barca may not have wanted to commit to an option. If he turns out to be amazing, then we know Barca are desperate to sell at the moment so we'd likely get a deal sorted either way.
Time to move onto Spence and then look at a midfielder and potentially another attack.
He had a good game against City. I had a great view of his work in that first half particularly. But it doesn't change the fact there were more bad games and even more games where he was injured. That's not a player you can rely on.
That same website had him down as specifically the worst player on the pitch in the game at the Camp Nou. They did caveat it with the fact it was a changed sided, but the comments that he struggled when under seige worry me. I remember we bossed the game and 1-1 flattered them tbh. Don't really remember him particularly but I don't pay much attention to opposition during games.
Last edited:
He'll soon be snapped up by RB Salzburg, or RB Leipzig or Leverkusen or another club for £10-15+m... and be worth 2-3 x that in 1-2 seasons.
Last edited:
Eriksen apparently demanded around £10m as a signing-on fee. That's not free. Plus a hefty salary. And Spurs did not contact him again after their initial and only contact, which means he was not that high on Conte's "wanted list".
Tielemans is more of a CM who's neither a CAM nor fit to play in a MF-2 formation.
Why? The club have made a decision thats best for us. If we werent happy, we would either continue to push for our preferred conditions or backed out.
Lets see what comes out in the wash
That is just not true.
If we weren't happy we would ship him back to Barca with or without buy OPTION. I am not talking about OBLIGATION.
But now in scenario where he will be very good for us, Barca will have all the leverage and can ask for 30 mil from us if they decide so.
Right now we carry the whole risk, Barca carries whole benefit.
100% this plus Tielamans is way too lazy for Conte. He would want somebody that puts in a shift.
Eriksen used to cover the distance under Poch and did win over Conte at Inter but I don't think it is a priority in our system with the front 3 we have.
I have a feeling we will spend it and then use money from sales in January.
The club has the facility to do another £150m share issue within the next 5 years so we will have a similar window again at some point.
I wonder what people’s views would be if a proportion of this summer’s £150m is used for Kane and Conte’s new contracts? It’s entirely possible/probable that is the case.
If Lenglet does play well for Spurs, then of course Spurs will benefit. How can they not benefit from that? According to "reports" Conte himself called Lenglet to convince him so it's obvious that Spurs have decided it's still worth it.
And you just know the ENIC haters will probably spin this "ENIC put money in the club now, because they knew there wouldn't be any players to spend it on."Amazing how we are struggling to spend all of the 150 mill windfall from ENIC.
Fabulous…
Fab Fridays should be about incomings, not outgoings
One day I'll browse this forum and find an entire day where you've not fucking moaned.
But clearly it is not this day.
We've had plenty of incomings already, and there'll be a couple more.
This isn't fucking football manager so if thats what you're after, get your ass off this forum, back to your basement, and go spend the day playing FM whilst sitting in your soiled pants and eating a bumper sized pack of cheetos! Fuck sake man.
"Fab Fridays" can be about both...it's just as important (if not more so) we clear out the deadwood now, as it is to bring in more players.