I think our front line options are far superior to West Hams, It's everything behind them that's woefully lackingWe need to buy another quality attacker.
Felt like West Ham actually have more strength in depth than us in attack.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I think our front line options are far superior to West Hams, It's everything behind them that's woefully lackingWe need to buy another quality attacker.
Felt like West Ham actually have more strength in depth than us in attack.
Yeah our first XI is far better.I think our front line options are far superior to West Hams, It's everything behind them that's woefully lacking
Our front 3 / 4 are better.
Our creativity is sucking the life out of Son imo. Need a creative midfielder in before window shuts imo.
That is crazy talk, I suggested it after the Chelsea game and got "why do we need him". Well we need him, or someone like him. It looks like the aim is to win every game 1-0, who knows what will happen if we need to start chasing a game.
We've still got around £280million worth of unparalleled ffp wriggle room to play with so you'd like to think so.Spunking 100 million on an elite central midfielder would be the best thing we could possibly do tomorrow.
It just feels like we haven't actually gotten around to replacing Eriksen (and even he was absent for that last year or so). For all the 'Conte's system doesn't use a CAM' arguments - I get it, but there's no way we can excel with a midfield so devoid of ideas.We've still got around £280million worth of ffp wriggle room to play with so you'd like to think so.
A good litmus test tomorrow to see if ENIC 's priorities have finally changed
Great call.That is crazy talk, I suggested it after the Chelsea game and got "why do we need him". Well we need him, or someone like him. It looks like the aim is to win every game 1-0, who knows what will happen if we need to start chasing a game.
It just feels like we haven't actually gotten around to replacing Eriksen (and even he was absent for that last year or so). For all the 'Conte's system doesn't use a CAM' arguments - I get it, but there's no way we can excel with a midfield so devoid of ideas.
Who, out of our main competition, doesn't have a lock-picker we'd gladly take into our squad?
I knew the lazy rhetoric of Spurs needing a creative midfielder would have been trotted out the moment we dropped points somewhere.
We didn't draw today because we lacked a creative midfielder. Just like West Ham didn't get a point because they added one to their squad. lol
The quicker we can get Richarlison and likely Spence in our starting eleven and Romero back in the side, the better. For everyone.
Basically everyone except City (obviously de Bryune) and they still attack down the sides more than the middle
Liverpool & Woolwich both attack primary through their wingers
Look, I'll settle for us running into the opposition box with purpose at this point.
![]()
That's the whitepill. Be hard to beat at the bare minimum and get the attack clicking - then you're away. It's also something needed for winning cups.