The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
This looks good. I’d give Porro a try at RW above Kulu. Bold risk but could pay off.1Vicario2Emerson3Romero4VanDenVen5Udogie6Skipp7Bissouma8Maddison9Kulu10Kane11Sonlineup code[lineup] Vicario Emerson Romero VanDenVen Udogie Skipp Bissouma Maddison Kulu Kane Son [/lineup]
This is my thinking. Ange doesn't like his FBs to bomb up and down, so one of Emerson and Davies HAS to play. Emerson is better than Davies IMO and Davies was more of a "marauding CB" in Conte's team.
Skipp is IMO the best tackler and defensive screen we have, I'd have him as a more static out and out DM, sort of orbitting Bissouma to give him passing options and put in defensive legwork.
Biss would be more box to box, Maddison needs to be solo no10, because the space is needed for him and Kane to interchange positions in the build up. He could have a similar rotation with Kulu.
Not by me he's not.
£40M is about right for a player of his quality, with a year left on his contract.
I'd be very happy if this goes through. I don't necessarily think he's the dick he's made out to be. He said some nasty stuff about Kane a decade ago. A lot can change in a personality over that time.
Not that I care. I'm not really that interested in whether he's arrogant or not, I don't have to socialise with him.
But it appears that Kane bears no grudge, which would lead me to believe that Maddison has apologised at some stage. It's not really a stretch to conclude that he's done a bit of growing up.
So fingers crossed, as I think he'll make a big difference to how we perform.
I'd say Porro at RW is a safer risk than Porro at RB.This looks good. I’d give Porro a try at RW above Kulu. Bold risk but could pay off.
1st TEAM | 2nd TEAM | 3rd TEAM | ? | |
1 | FORSTER | LLORIS | AUSTIN | WHITEMAN |
2 | PORRO | SPENCE | ||
3 | PERISIC | UDOGIE | SESSEGNON | REGUILLON |
4 | ROMERO | ROYAL | TANGANGA | SANCHEZ |
5 | DIER | DAVIES | RODON | |
6 | HOJBJERG | SKIPP | ||
7 | BISSOUMA | SARR | WINKS | |
8 | BENTACUR | GLC | WHITE | |
9 | KULUSEVSKI | NDOMBELE | ||
10 | SON | GIL | ||
11 | KANE | RICHARLISON | ||
11 | 11 | 6 | 3 | |
1Vicario2Emerson3Romero4VanDenVen5Udogie6Skipp7Bissouma8Maddison9Kulu10Kane11Sonlineup code[lineup] Vicario Emerson Romero VanDenVen Udogie Skipp Bissouma Maddison Kulu Kane Son [/lineup]
This is my thinking. Ange doesn't like his FBs to bomb up and down, so one of Emerson and Davies HAS to play. Emerson is better than Davies IMO and Davies was more of a "marauding CB" in Conte's team.
Skipp is IMO the best tackler and defensive screen we have, I'd have him as a more static out and out DM, sort of orbitting Bissouma to give him passing options and put in defensive legwork.
Biss would be more box to box, Maddison needs to be solo no10, because the space is needed for him and Kane to interchange positions in the build up. He could have a similar rotation with Kulu.
Not sure Porro will be successful at RB for Spurs under Ange. He's only going to make it here as a winger, I feel and even then, he isn't the greatest dribbler. His strengths lay in his crossing.
It's a shame it's an obligation to buy
What about Porro at RW is better than Kulu? Ok he's scored a few goals which is great for a WB, but by winger standards he's really nothing special. His main standout trait is the TAA-like long passes.This looks good. I’d give Porro a try at RW above Kulu. Bold risk but could pay off.
what did he say about kane?Not by me he's not.
£40M is about right for a player of his quality, with a year left on his contract.
I'd be very happy if this goes through. I don't necessarily think he's the dick he's made out to be. He said some nasty stuff about Kane a decade ago. A lot can change in a personality over that time.
Not that I care. I'm not really that interested in whether he's arrogant or not, I don't have to socialise with him.
But it appears that Kane bears no grudge, which would lead me to believe that Maddison has apologised at some stage. It's not really a stretch to conclude that he's done a bit of growing up.
So fingers crossed, as I think he'll make a big difference to how we perform.
Where's the "have we signed him yet" thread that'll definitely workLet's hope history doesn't repeat eh?
Raya
- Wanted to come to Spurs
- Agreed to personal terms
- thought we could haggle a ridiculous asking price down
- WELCOME VICARIO!
Maddison
- Wants to come to Spurs
- Agreed to personal terms
- Think we can haggle a ridiculous price down
- WELCOME ???
Still too early to say imo.Not sure Porro will be successful at RB for Spurs under Ange. He's only going to make it here as a winger, I feel and even then, he isn't the greatest dribbler. His strengths lay in his crossing.
It's a shame it's an obligation to buy
And good finishing. He's a bloody good striker of the ball.What about Porro at RW is better than Kulu? Ok he's scored a few goals which is great for a WB, but by winger standards he's really nothing special. His main standout trait is the TAA-like long passes.
For a WB. I seem to recall quite a few wild shots into row z. Though, compared to Kulu, who is exceptionally shot shy and quite poor when he does try, Porro does seem the better option in that regard.
Have a feeling this take is going to keep popping up and then Porro ends up making them look silly