Why is it to "better effect"? It's just different.
One would assume you typically change a CF to give the CBs something a little different to handle, not that they've gassed out.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Why is it to "better effect"? It's just different.
One would assume you typically change a CF to give the CBs something a little different to handle, not that they've gassed out.
Man you are dumb. I’m done with you, life is too short
Trust me... I'm not being dumb.... I'm being mildly facetious, granted; but that's because you're avoiding the difficult question(s)...... i.e. The very punchline to your very first post.
...And whether you like it or not you DID say pay 100m for a 50m player and that's NOT overpaying by just "a little bit".
You started off with plenty of bluster; where has it gone all of a sudden?
Because Son is older and plays on the wing, both imply that he would need to be subbed off before Richy, so if you want to only sub one player off subbing Richy instead of Son is going to be less effective.
You want to freshen up the CF position by putting a 31-year-old who played 70 minutes there, that is not as effective as subbing on a player from the bench.
No my friend... You certainly didn't answer the main, over-riding one.
But that's exactly what Jordan said...
I wasn't aware that we were assuming that Son & Rich can't last a full 90mins......
.........But; you could still sub 2, just that it wouldn't be both Son & Rich in a single game.
Do you understand why this is far from ideal?
90 'opportunities'(*) to prove yourself should be more than ample....................
(*Every minute is a new opportunity.)
We "Boo" because we care!
"FAR" from ideal?
........Not particularly.
As I already said; to my mind you tend to swap a CF for different attributes, not for fresh legs.
- Rich has not long turned 26; his legs should not be an issue.
- Son hasn't proved until now that stamina is a particular concern either.
Less games this season too.
And Lankshear, who was prolific until his injury.
Or the right option?I’m not necessarily saying we should have gone Rice, it was a standard point of us always going for the cheaper option
Bissouma for £25M or Rice for £105M?
I guess we'll just have to wait and see which of the two has the better season or, more to the point, who has the greater respective impact.
There are certain players where every time I watch them I wonder why Spurs don't make a bid.
Maddison was one of them. Ruben Neves was one of them. Nathan Ake was one of them. Eze is one of them.
Maddison was one of them. Ruben Neves was one of them. Nathan Ake was one of them. Eze is one of them.
Daniel Levy
He basically said £120 made from selling Mount and Havertz puts them in profit over spending £900m because reasons...
Whatever stupid loophole there is in FFP that allows them to cook the books, there's no way you can look at their business and try and claim they are making a profit with a straight face.
Even if they are managing to stay on the right side of FFP with their shenanigans, it can only be by a fine margin. You also have to ask yourself, if this is in any way a good idea, why aren't all clubs doing it (I mean with the absurd fees, I know all clubs are spreading their payments).
Boehly must think he's spotted an opportunity that no one else has, so I'm left to wonder, put all 20 people in charge of PL clubs in a room together, is Todd Boehly really the smartest of the bunch?
Finally, it seems that they are taking advantage to some extent of not having to abide by some of the rules as they're not in Europe, and PL rules are more lax. But surely the extra money he's gambling on getting long term is dependent on getting into Europe, which the spending they're doing to achieve that might also see them barred from said competitions.
It's absolutely mental, and surely unsustainable, but you just know those cunts will somehow land on their feet no matter what. Infuriating.
Yeah. Bissouma style (and perhaps a wise calculated gamble given our lack of European fixture congestion this season).