The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
But if Dier, Tanganga, Sanchez are all away then yes we do. It means that Davies is our only current CB
We've been in for Johnson and Gallagher before tbf.It just doesn't seem like there is a proper list of priority targets. It all sounds opportunistic.
No, he's definitely not an ideal 6 for this system, but neither is Hojbjerg and he has been filling in at times.Not sure about being a 6. Gallagher’s weakest point is he is not for the want of a better word a ‘’baller’’ like Bissouma, Bentancur or Sarr. Our system you need the player at the base of midfield to be the best or close to best baller in the team, great press resistance, ability to progress the ball from deep.
He isn’t that guy, he is a more a fighter and hard presser with a good eye for goals, like a Lampard type, a solid number 8 or maybe a number 10.
Hope not.
And, Levy being Levy, like no change was urged last season. Surreal times. If we wobble in the coming weeks and haven’t spent £80m at least tomorrow on Johnson and Scharr (seem front runners), bile is rightly going to be aimed fiercely at Levy and Co.
We've been watching Johnson since he was in the Championship.It just doesn't seem like there is a proper list of priority targets. It all sounds opportunistic.
It seems like Vicario, Maddison, VDV and Solomon were players we actually did our diligence on and now it's just Levy and Paratici rooting around the bins and eavesdropping on what other clubs are doing. We already spent the Kane money so anything more depends on sales. What a sad state of affairs, I feel for Ange.
Because they're all not at the 'Big 6', hence 'the Other 14'.
Counting Udogie, we’ve clearly upgraded at four positions this year (if you include the rarely used Bissouma and Sarr the arguably six). We’ve lost Harry so one (very) significant downgrade.It just doesn't seem like there is a proper list of priority targets. It all sounds opportunistic.
It seems like Vicario, Maddison, VDV and Solomon were players we actually did our diligence on and now it's just Levy and Paratici rooting around the bins and eavesdropping on what other clubs are doing. We already spent the Kane money so anything more depends on sales. What a sad state of affairs, I feel for Ange.
Johnson, Scharr and Orban, mad 24hours to come bro’gravenberch 40 mill to liverpool
bakayoko to brentford
and we are getting lloyd kelly
Maybe change your name to get out
You just type things and convince yourself they are true don’t you?
No, he's definitely not an ideal 6 for this system, but neither is Hojbjerg and he has been filling in at times.
TBH, I think we need a player like that to be both Maddison's backup as well as starting alongside him when we want to really attacking.Not sure about being a 6. Gallagher’s weakest point is he is not for the want of a better word a ‘’baller’’ like Bissouma, Bentancur or Sarr. Our system you need the player at the base of midfield to be the best or close to best baller in the team, great press resistance, ability to progress the ball from deep.
He isn’t that guy, he is a more a fighter and hard presser with a good eye for goals, like a Lampard type, a solid number 8 or maybe a number 10.
Now that Skippy seems to have taken on Winks' scapegoat mantle, as I exclusively predicted 18 months ago, I'm going to go all in and say Bents will be the next out of the traps after a couple of so-so games coming back from injury.
TBH, I think we need a player like that to be both Maddison's backup as well as starting alongside him when we want to really attacking.
Biss on his own behind them should be fine.
I just don't like Gallagher cos he'd be super expensive and he's not that good, and as you said he's not very technical.