-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Management Levy / ENIC
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Steady Callum Hudson Odoi isn't going to cost that.
What would be an acceptable window for you?
agree, I'm just saying sometimes the perfect player for us is out there but it's going to cost us 100 million like Rice, are we the club to do the deal that's needed to raise our level, or are we still the club that will say nope and look for the "cheaper" 37 million plus add ons alt
Can we not go down this road againjust let them have it.
Actually removes excuses for this summer because there isn’t a Romero/Kulusevski/Porro that can be added to inflate the net spend for the window…
Nothing less than 150m net should be accepted. Even those defending Levy budgets must surely agree on that.
It doesn't even matter anyway, it all counts as the same, it's still money spent but on separate balance sheets
Even if you don't count The Kulu and Porro fees then it's around £80m net but you go back one season and say we spent around £200m the season before or something like that.
Such a pointless debate
The sad thing is, he probably would.Steady Callum Hudson Odoi isn't going to cost that.
We definitely have the money to do it, there's no question.
The question is who is that player?
Like you more or less knew that Alison and Van Dijk and Rice would move the team up levels where their teams will compete for years.
I wouldn't even begin to tell you who the equivalent is unless somehow Rodrigo becomes available and wants us or someone like that.
Title winners that
It doesn't even matter anyway, it all counts as the same, it's still money spent but on separate balance sheets
Even if you don't count The Kulu and Porro fees then it's around £80m net but you go back one season and say we spent around £200m the season before or something like that.
Such a pointless debate
What is the worthwhile debate on transfer ambition?
Think everyone is pretty much agreed that we need quality players up front and at #6.
Unless our scouting is better than everyone else on the market, the more certain quality in those positions cost big fees and demand big wages.
As you say, we can afford both. The question is if we actually want to do it.
Not this
You can only really tell if we are ambitious or not after the fact i.e if the player is a success otherwise you might as well say Chelsea are the most ambitious club in the world over the last few years!
So basically become Crystal Palace, I see
same like liverpool used to do to southampton with Mane, VVD. sometimes you've just to take mid table teams very best even if it costs crazy money
Fairs, Wharton isn't near that level anyway, guy's literally had about 10 matches in the Premier League
Anyway I'll re-iterate that neither player truly fit what we're in dire need of although I think Eze would be far more use to us as he can play in more than one position, Oliseh is much better at cutting in, we need someone to hold width.
Striker, a winger (specialist) A 6, backup full backs or a CB/LB hybrid.
agree on Wharton, looks a talent but it's not yet right to spend crazy to get him here. Unfortunately if he does remain consistent then we wont have a chance as bigger fish will take him
We already bought Bergvall for that reason, can't buy everyone I'm afraid.
Incidentally we have some incredible talent coming out of our academy who, given the right career path, can make their way into the first team in the next few years.
Bvergall needs to be a part of the first team squad. I want to see him fully integrated in pre-season and thrown in the deep end.
We’ve been pitiful at bringing youngsters into the team.
One of the benefits of EL football as opposed to CL I suppose.