Seems like we let him go on a free so they could afford to sign him. Fair play.
View: https://x.com/TheSpursExpress/status/1809536914577584317
View: https://x.com/TheSpursExpress/status/1809536914577584317
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Good post and within it is the reason we won’t be getting Nico Williams. He is currently on 200k pew week at Bilbao and wants more. His wage demands are the reason Barcelona have pulled out of pursuing him. How much would Eze be after? He is on 100k. He Would probably be happy with 120 pw.Don't obsess over the value of the transfer fee for a player.
All our competitors routinely spend +£60m on almost all of their players now!! We have revenues bigger than all bar 3 of them now, so we are now swimming in the lane we have always aspired to, this is what it looks like.
If you want to focus on "value" then that's on what we pay them on wages. This is where the danger is if the player isn't any good, as they can sit on your books on inflated salaries and no one else can afford to take him off your hands (every club is littered with these mistakes). Transfer values are amortised over the contracts meaning future transfer fees can easily be obtained but only if the salaries can be afforded by the new club (and they rarely are). And our expertise has been to keep our salaries at a base way lower than our competitors, in fact, we have the best wage-to-revenue % in the division.
Spending £30m-£40m on an 18yr old (Archie Gray) for example means that by the time he's 22 with a year left on his contract, he stands us in at £8m!! This is the same across all the young players we've signed recently and as they are young I'm assuming that their wages are "relatively low" (I'd be surprised they are above £100k per week).
Eze is in a different bracket, he's 26 so likely his next move is to be his last in the top flight, his wage demands are likely to also be high as a result but as he's at palace I assume they are still affordable for us, coupled with a buyout clause that requires this to be paid upfront means this is a huge investment. And because of PSR that makes us one of about only 2 or 3 clubs that could entertain this deal. It also means that despite all the press noise surrounding him Palace do not have a queue of Clubs competitively fighting over his signature, which is actually very bad for Palace, who would love to sell him if they want to continue investing in the squad (he's 26 - approaching his maximum value but with 2yrs remaining on his contract - currently stands them in on their books at £6m), right now Palace position is to say he's not for sale (as we did with Bale), whilst secretly keeping their collective fingers crossed one of the 2/3 clubs blink and make a move for him.
I love the fact we are linked with him and the likes of Williams, Neto, Doue etc I'd happily see any of these at Spurs with probably Eze being the most expensive option when you take his age, wage and upfront lump fee need to be paid (bet that can be chipped away at if we really are one of a couple of clubs sniffing). We offloaded a lot of players already, some that have been on massive wages (Ndombele, Kane, Lloris, Peresic all on approx £200k pw, with Dier, Sess, Sanchez, Winks, Moura and soon-to-be Reggie, Royal & PEH all on competitive wages with Rodon, Tanganga & Spence on smaller wages) I think we can afford to roll the dice on a player if those within the club think he can come in a fit the system but might turn to shit under the Tottenham "expensive hires jinx".
exactly.Don't obsess over the value of the transfer fee for a player.
All our competitors routinely spend +£60m on almost all of their players now!! We have revenues bigger than all bar 3 of them now, so we are now swimming in the lane we have always aspired to, this is what it looks like.
If you want to focus on "value" then that's on what we pay them on wages. This is where the danger is if the player isn't any good, as they can sit on your books on inflated salaries and no one else can afford to take him off your hands (every club is littered with these mistakes). Transfer values are amortised over the contracts meaning future transfer fees can easily be obtained but only if the salaries can be afforded by the new club (and they rarely are). And our expertise has been to keep our salaries at a base way lower than our competitors, in fact, we have the best wage-to-revenue % in the division.
Spending £30m-£40m on an 18yr old (Archie Gray) for example means that by the time he's 22 with a year left on his contract, he stands us in at £8m!! This is the same across all the young players we've signed recently and as they are young I'm assuming that their wages are "relatively low" (I'd be surprised they are above £100k per week).
Eze is in a different bracket, he's 26 so likely his next move is to be his last in the top flight, his wage demands are likely to also be high as a result but as he's at palace I assume they are still affordable for us, coupled with a buyout clause that requires this to be paid upfront means this is a huge investment. And because of PSR that makes us one of about only 2 or 3 clubs that could entertain this deal. It also means that despite all the press noise surrounding him Palace do not have a queue of Clubs competitively fighting over his signature, which is actually very bad for Palace, who would love to sell him if they want to continue investing in the squad (he's 26 - approaching his maximum value but with 2yrs remaining on his contract - currently stands them in on their books at £6m), right now Palace position is to say he's not for sale (as we did with Bale), whilst secretly keeping their collective fingers crossed one of the 2/3 clubs blink and make a move for him.
I love the fact we are linked with him and the likes of Williams, Neto, Doue etc I'd happily see any of these at Spurs with probably Eze being the most expensive option when you take his age, wage and upfront lump fee need to be paid (bet that can be chipped away at if we really are one of a couple of clubs sniffing). We offloaded a lot of players already, some that have been on massive wages (Ndombele, Kane, Lloris, Peresic all on approx £200k pw, with Dier, Sess, Sanchez, Winks, Moura and soon-to-be Reggie, Royal & PEH all on competitive wages with Rodon, Tanganga & Spence on smaller wages) I think we can afford to roll the dice on a player if those within the club think he can come in a fit the system but might turn to shit under the Tottenham "expensive hires jinx".
exactly.
If he has been identified as the player to improve us then pay it.
I don’t want Neto, too injury prone. Also can we stop comparing Doue, Neto and Eze.
Eze is AM the other two play out wide.
I‘d like to see us get Doue and Eze as well as a striker
Seems like we let him go on a free so they could afford to sign him. Fair play.
View: https://x.com/TheSpursExpress/status/1809536914577584317
left sided attack or central attacking mid. The more versatile the better.Where does he play in our team, there's no defined role for him?
I'm a Johnson fan as well. Eze rarely plays on the right though.I’m not wholly convinced either in his ability to deliver at the highest level, or is he that much of an upgrade on who we already have? Does he replace Maddison? Johnson?
I’m convinced by what I’ve seen of both these players that they’ll have huge seasons for us, Johnson especially. So are we spending that money on depth? Big cash when we could get a big upgrade at centre forward by spending a bit more.
left sided attack or central attacking mid. The more versatile the better.
I mean Toney at 25m is an absolute no brainer.Can see it getting to mid August and a deal for Toney for £25m gets done. No ITK just get the feeling it’s gone quiet on our other 9 links and reckon Brentford will start getting desperate to shift.
Wouldn’t be my first choice by any means but think he can do a job for us and would be a net contributor, and for a relatively low fee the age is less of an issue as if nothing else it may well be that one of Veliz, Parrott, Scarlett or Lankshear has a breakout over the next couple of years meaning we have a youngster ready to step up!
ok but the thing is it doesn't really matter if you're not convinced or if I am convinced.
ok but the thing is it doesn't really matter if you're not convinced or if I am convinced.
If he has been identified by the DOF and Ange as a main target then we should pay it, that's my point.
absolutely no chance in hell we splash 60m plus on a player Ange doesn't like/want.The thing is I don't think he has though, I think we are being linked with him because he's a Base client and he's homegrown.
absolutely no chance in hell we splash 60m plus on a player Ange doesn't like/want.
I'm a Johnson fan as well. Eze rarely plays on the right though.
Maddison can't get away with putting in those bum performances he put In second half of the season where he did his best ghost impersonation and Ange still continued to pick him.
Eze is literally the best player we’ve been linked to this summer. Did you not expect him to be expensive ?
I’m not wholly convinced either in his ability to deliver at the highest level, or is he that much of an upgrade on who we already have? Does he replace Maddison? Johnson?
I’m convinced by what I’ve seen of both these players that they’ll have huge seasons for us, Johnson especially. So are we spending that money on depth? Big cash when we could get a big upgrade at centre forward by spending a bit more.