Deep down I think every single one of us knows this. Even those who would never, ever admit it.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer thread - 2024
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
mmm, it's also a potentially very talented young player for the future.
If it was purely about tickets he could have signed a bunch of much cheaper players from the k-league previously , maybe even hosted some K-pop concerts
Last edited:
In what world is that mid table
Eze is better than midtable. There's a reason he's been capped for England, and has been linked with both us and City for two seasons now.
look at the captain ffs. PR cash cow shit. really is worrying. never going to win fuck all with this approach.
He doesn't look good on the video....and we don't need another wide player...all in all I think Ange is out of his depth in the PL...mmm, it's also a potentially very talented young player for the future.
If it was purely about tickets he called have signed a bunch of much cheaper players from k-league previously , maybe even hosted some K-pop concerts
This explains why he's crap. I'd be perpetually exhausted from lack of sleep.
probably slightly better than. crouch, defoe and pav
It’s better than Martinelli, Havertz, Jesus, Trossard
It's without doubt a key tick on the business case for signing him that saw him prioritised over other equally promising players.
But we have to assume he's a good prospect that is worth the money. I'd like to hope we're beyond the Bongani Khumalo days.
Like riffling a corpse for its shoes ( only then is it acceptable).
Whoever the scouting team decide, you or me don't decide these things do we.
You want Toney I see, but do you think he will fit our system, maybe but maybe not.
Brentford are more counter attacking than we are, ange likes to go after the game.
Maybe we won't even buy a striker, do you think it's essential? Along with a couple of such as Eze and Neto, we probably need a good DM and another defensive player.
But again I'm not picking the players nor are you, it's all subject to opinions like everything else on here.
Fucking state of the disagree on this post.
What the actual fuck is wrong with him? I can't figure out if he's a (not got a) massive bellend or massively on the spectrum. No ordinary human acts like that.
Edit - anyone else, please feel free to disagree just for shits and giggles.
Last edited:
So you don't think Toney would fit into our team but you but have no idea on whether the alternatives would either, so how would you know if the other options are better?
All this personal crap just because of a rating - foul voted.
The morons are at it again.
If Yang is a bust I don't see Koreans flocking to whl like they have with Son. It's in our interest to sign players we actually think have a chance of making it. Obviously commercial interests can play a part but it's a moot consideration if the player is never likely to be good enough.
If Yang is a bust I don't see Koreans flocking to whl like they have with Son. It's in our interest to sign players we actually think have a chance of making it. Obviously commercial interests can play a part but it's a moot consideration if the player is never likely to be good enough.
Ultra triggered by a disagree on a post that's not even yours. Are you OK?
Dan I'm not arguing with you, I think you are a bit rattled today.
If Toney becomes our player then fine I will support that, I'm just saying I'm not really sure who or what options are better, and let's face it neither do you mate.
Still doesn't make Toney a good option from his perspective just because he doesn't know who would be better.
It's a simple yes or no decision for Toney as a signing and the most logical answer when you consider all the factors, is NO.
Sorry
Admin
but I'm simply not having being called autistic just because I gave a disagree to a passive-aggressive post I thoroughly and genuinely disagreed with.Utterly and entirely unacceptable to use neurodivergence as an insult.