If you read my post then you will see that I DO rate him. Basically he’s very good when he plays centrally as he can hold the ball up well, link play, he‘s a great in our press too. Point is, we are heavily rumoured to be looking for wide players who are good 1v1, if we achieve bringing them in, Kulu plays where? As a wide player in Angel’s system he’s not that effective, only when he comes inside off his line does he shine, Ange wants his FB’s to provide that (an over simplification). When Kulu plays as a 10 he’s been very good but very different to Madders (almost a false 9), so he’s not a direct like for like cover with him.Selling Kulusevski unless we get 50m is madness. When you have players who cover 3, maybe even 4 positions like that, it saves you squad spaces and wages for better players elsewhere.
No point making any of the valid points about Kulusevski to those that don't rate him. He could finish the season with 15 goals and 10 assists playing the false 9 role and they would still hate him.
So, if new attacking players are found and they go straight into the side where does he play? His value will drop as a result And we miss an opportunity to sell while his stock is high. All this is of course moot because it requires us bringing in new players who slot straight into the first team and I don’t know if this is going to happen.