Not in the least bit supprised.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Not in the least bit supprised.
This is the most stupid contribution I've seen here in months and that is some contribution.
Both can be trueYou want to see a terrible market? See right wingers. The only real option is apparently Neto who is permanently crocked for 60m.
The durability part about Solanke is compelling after all the injury problems we’ve endured recently. Feeling better about the signing the more I think about it, but still underwhelmed overall. We’re supposed to be playing Ange-ball but the only wingers we’ve signed are Werner and Johnson? If Solanke is the only attacking signing we make it’s a depressing indictment of recent club xfer policy.I don’t really care if we overpay for a player if it helps the team find some stability in the final third. I think he could hit the ground running, is durable with regards injuries, and has proven he can lead a press, which will help the whole team m, including our defence.
It just made me wonder why you would want to spend time chatting away with people you suspect of domestic abuse. Think it says,more about that person and how sad their life must be. I just ignore people here I don't respect.Can't we blow off steam by calling Levy a cunt AND beat our loved ones? Seems a bit divisive your rhetoric.
What is this? FM?
Clearly you do..
Neto has never really seemed real prospect to me. We're not spending big money on a RW the summer after spending big money on a RW who scored or assisted 20% of our goals last season in a rotational role. We're getting a lot more Johnson this season, regardless of what the anti-stat crowd want.I bet we don’t sign Neto. There only one itk bullshitter on sc that says we are keen for him. All other reports have been vague as fuck.
If he can emulate close enough to what he did last season, which was to be at 12 goals by the end of December, then we'll at least know this lads career is legit taking off and we're not signing a player who can't consistently bang in a ton of goals season on season. If they charge that more, then so be it? Seems a necessary risk to me! Don't you think?If Solanke has a decent first half season then, given that January is generally a harder window, Bournemouth will ask for more (75m?) and if we sit tight this summer and get bad cup draws, it might be too late to save the season anyway.
(There’s always a chance that Bournemouth have a good cup — could be in FA Cup 5th Rd / League Cup S/F by window’s end — or league run or, alternatively, in a relegation fight and don’t want to sell).
The striker market is never good . Scoring goals is probably the hardest thing in football and no club wants to sell their goalscorers. Having a good goalscoring no.9 who connects play is hard to find.I know, but the original post I was commenting to was this:
The striker market isn't that bad, you have Solanke, Toney, Gyokeres all available. People here are just turning their noses up at all options that aren't from a foreign league.
In what world is the striker market not bad when those 3 are the best options out there?
My bad.
I would, if it was a lobotomy
Dovbyk was pichichi last season, not Sorloth.The striker market is never good . Scoring goals is probably the hardest thing in football and no club wants to sell their goalscorers. Having a good goalscoring no.9 who connects play is hard to find.
The options out there would elevate us without a doubt.
Look at all the top 5 teams in Europe, most don't have a genuine no.9 who bags loads of goals, it's more their general work. Alexander Sorloth was the highest scoring striker in la liga with 23 non penalty goals(he flopped at palace) now going to Atletico Madrid.
Thank you. Wasn't so hard was it? Not sure where you got this "hypothetical story" idea from though, they were questions.Again, eh?
Again, eh?
Q1) "But if you stand still you go backwards right?"
A vague generic question but ok.
Q2)
"So our rivals who have done no business will go backwards if they don't buy to improve right?"
Who are these rivals is a pertinent question because I've been told we're going for the title this season so that leads me to believe our rivals are the top 3 unless you disagree with that?
Assuming you don't, I think the fact the top 3 finished 17, 23 & 25 points ahead of us means they won't be going backwards relative to us if they make no signings, given who we've signed and who we're being linked to.
Now when you factor in the fact that the top 2 have made signings, it seems that you're chatting rubbish for the sake of it with a nonsense hypothetical story about our rivals not making signings, unless of course you don't see the top 3 as our rivals?
Over to you.
Yes, I think...it's 65m. I imagine it should be able to be triggered in Jan too. I'd assume it's legit until his contract is finished with Bournemouth. So yeah, I really think that would be the best way forward for us!My bad.
He )Solanke) has a release clause, doesn’t he?
I’m assuming it can be triggered in January.
Does anyone know if it has time limits on it?
Yes because that definitely means that people are unable to think of viable alternatives on the market doesn't it...
When you have the time to use your brain you'll probably realise that the price of Solanke is a symptom of what's actually on the market.
I can't believe they let you out of the asylum already and you're already speaking nonsense, Good Lord - at least it's not xenophobic crap this time I suppose.