• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer thread - 2024

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

How Dry should our Powder be?


  • Total voters
    57
Wharton has been a little overhyped imo. He’s comfortable on the ball but he’s a little one paced and off the ball he’s pretty immobile. He’s not worth what Palace would want for him.
He’s playing in what looks like a double pivot today and it’s asking him to do more running and defending in transition than he’s good for.

As a sitting DM like Carrick he’s got the tools and temperament
 
Watching Ramsey again yesterday, hasn’t lost that mobility and running power. He just looks like a top player when he’s on the ball. Got a bit of everything for a midfielder
 
Tbh I think it’s better to count players signed for the project not accounting quirks like loan to buy players from previous projects.

It’s just a more honest way to do it. Same for counting bonus payments before the bonuses have been triggered.

I also don’t trust 99% of the reported sums.

These days I’d say backing a manager is about how well the squad is constructed for the way they want to play.

Forget sums but Lenglet on loan and 21 year old Spence at RWB wasn’t backing a manager like Conte who plays 3 at the back with wing backs.

Ange is getting a squad built with players which suit him or will suit him as they develop.

I disagree. Both Kulsevski and Porro have been key players for Ange and we signed them after he joined. I understand with Porro there was an obligation to make the loan permanent but do not know about Kulusevski. Fact is we've spent that much money since Ange became our first team coach. Be proud that our new stadium is funding significant investment in players, which was the plan all along. What is really exciting is that, once this young squad is built, and it may take another window, we will only need to spend on top quality players to improve the starting XI moving forwards. With a conveyor belt of talent like Moore, Donley, Devine, Vuskovic etc. coming through it is prosperous times.
 
I would get rid of Richie. If Toney leaves Brentford for Saudi they might take him on loan at least, given Toney replacement has a long term injury.

reasoning
1. we have cover for Solanke in Kulu, Son and Lankshear
2. His mental fragility will not go well on the sub bench
3. frees up a Non-HG/johnny foreigner spot.
4. Ange sees him as surplus to requirements given willing to transfer to Saudi.
 
He’s playing in what looks like a double pivot today and it’s asking him to do more running and defending in transition than he’s good for.

As a sitting DM like Carrick he’s got the tools and temperament
he hasn’t got that defensive reading of the game that Carrick had. Not yet anyway. Carrick was one of the best at intercepting passes going into that ten position and he could eat up the ground when he needed too. Great two footed passer as well. I’d be surprised if Wharton got to that level. I like him but yeah a bit overrated right now
 
Jeff Goldblum What GIF by The Late Late Show with James Corden
 
With Hughes?

Or did he usually have a more athletic partner in there?

The way Brentford are making him look in transition is exposing him a bit tbh

Almost always Hughes. Double pivot, 3 at the back, wing backs either side.

Whenever Hughes wasn't fit (rare) in they put Lerma in there. But it was rare

Today's Palace set up is practically identical to last seasons. Except they haven't got Olise being a magician. And the perennially average Mateta isn't in a purple patch anymore.
 
Back
Top