• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer thread - 2024

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

How Dry should our Powder be?


  • Total voters
    58

View: https://x.com/HotspurLane/status/1828680505585217983

They had really better be and that Coulibaly link was hardly encouraging. Not complaining about the window overall. Tbh It's been better than I was expecting after the Werner loan came first but it's dangerous game not signing cover for that left side of defence and we are the type of club who always gets unlucky everytime we play that game.


Classic Romano base covering though surely?
 

Thats an absolute bargain. Nothing to lose with that fee, if he's shit sell him back to Serie A or Saudi in 18 months for a few mil. I think we've missed a trick. Chiesa for Werner and our window would be a lot healthier. Would just need that left sided defender.
 
Thats an absolute bargain. Nothing to lose with that fee, if he's shit sell him back to Serie A or Saudi in 18 months for a few mil. I think we've missed a trick. Chiesa for Werner and our window would be a lot healthier. Would just need that left sided defender.
Not good enough for us according to folk on here yet good enough for Liverpool who already have a better attack than us.

:ange-facepalm2:
 
We need to get on top of AI with it. The team that does that first will be ahead of the pack. Although I’m one of the people who prefers the eye test. It’s why I’m no Brennan Johnson fan despite his numbers. I can see past those and what he doesn’t offer on the pitch. Nobody should be paying £50 million or whatever it was for a player who doesn’t look up before he crosses 70% of the time.

It’s the other way round. Data analysts aren’t looking at goals and assists, we can all do that, they are looking at underlying metrics and how they weight in relation to type of team tactically etc to try and find tactical match ups that represent value.

I think we ended up with Johnson - pre Lange - because Ange likes a wide forward who can go outside (as his FB’s go inside). I think Johnson was largely an eye-test purchase pre Lange (Paratici) as we’d been linked previously.
 
That’s a steel IMO. Yes he’s got injury issues but the fee means it’s low risk. We really should have gone in hard for him with our links.

Thats an absolute bargain. Nothing to lose with that fee, if he's shit sell him back to Serie A or Saudi in 18 months for a few mil. I think we've missed a trick. Chiesa for Werner and our window would be a lot healthier. Would just need that left sided defender.

Don't know the wages. Could be £300,000 a week for all we know.
If he ends up injured all the time that's a huge commitment.
 
In both seasons we had European commitments. Neither Leicester or Chelsea did.
Chelsea had a better squad than us in 16/17 though.
Anyone trying to argue we had a better side quality wise on paper is deluded.

No European football helped, but we had no European football last season and we were still crap for large periods.

The quality of your first team and squad is and always will be the most important factor when it comes to winning trophies. (Leicester being the rare exception of course)
 
Not sure I 100% agree -

People were rightly talking at the beginning of the window about wanting to put an end to buying backups and buying players to compete directly with others in their positions. No more first team and backups - everyone should be good enough to start for Spurs in any competition if they are in our squad.

Not sure the people at the club agree with you - Kulu is obviously being moved centrally which opens up a position at RW to compete with Johnson.

Either way, I appreciate the back and forth on this - I think this season will show us exactly how this squad is thought of and whether or not we have wasted some serious cash on players we are trying to dump after a couple of seasons. Like I said in my earlier posts 15 G&A combined for both Richy and Johnson last season cemented their place in the squad for this season - fluke, one offs, however people want to dress up how and why they got those returns, they did and to me anyway, it's clear the club see them as important players in the squad this season because of it.
Let me explain why I really do mean waste of money when discussing Richy/Johnno. Double spending.

To illustrate my point, let’s look at three really good transfers and examples of great recruitment: Romero Porro and VDV. each of these players were bought for high fees, £40m+, but with that comes the requisite quality. These players are pretty much penciled in on the team sheet and locks to start every match. Not perfect players, but everyone agrees they’re key parts of our foundation moving forward and, more importantly, it will be hard to upgrade upon them in the market.

As a result, we don’t need to buy a new CB to replace Romero or VDV because they didn’t work out.

let’s compare and contrast with £60m Richy and £50m Johnno - basically after only one season, the club and manager decided that we need to spend big on a new striker and a new winger, specifically RW. While Neto didn’t come off, Odobert did and it’s clear from Ange’s comments that he wants a RW upgrade. As for Richy, we did however spend £65m on Solanke, which is a sign the club did not trust Richy to be that foundational striker piece.

Do you see the difference? Our defenders are foundational, hard to upgrade, and penciled in - key parts of our future. Johnno and Richy on the other hand have been immediately targeted as positions we need to upgrade despite spending that money.

What this does is necessitates situations where we’re DOUBLE spending on a position so now our striker outlay is £120m between Dom/ Richy and our winger outlay is in the hundred million range because we had to immediately get an upgrade on Johnson. That is why it’s a waste of money. Look I know not every transfer will be a hit but with our chairman’s financial limitations, we really cannot afford to be missing on £50/60m transfers. And unfortunately we’ve done just that.
 
Diaz/Chiesa
Jota/Nunez
Salah/Gakpo

That's pretty insane depth.

It's not many minutes for Chiesa though.

Which is exactly why I don't really see what all the fuss is about. He will be a bench option for them and probably not even play that much in the prem.


Would I have preferred him to Werner? yes.
Does it make sense to break your wage structure for a spot in the rotation that might not always make the matchday squad? not at all. Especially when Werner is a loan so doesn't need to be shifted when you start bringing Mikey Moore through.

Chiesa will either win the battle with Diaz or Salah will pick up an injury. If not he's a 4 year contract on huge money that they have no chance to move on whilst riding the bench.
 
Back
Top