Listen to this wet little bitch.
Fuck off.
Guy rarely even turns up for us - saves those performances for his national side - now encouraging us to hang onto this dud of a manager.
Get out as well.
Piss take.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I think we can safely say that at his age, Spurs is the biggest job Ange will ever have in football.Unrelated.. But if Pep leaves at the end of his contract in 2026. Are we still worried about them sniffing around Ange? We were told a lot about that a lot about a year or so ago by Neville and the brain trust at Talksport and such. I'm just wondering where we're all at with that.
I personally am in the camp where I think both are true.
There are elements of Ange’s way of playing/management is giving me major concerns right now, but I also feel that the board/Ange had a complete dereliction of duty in the transfer market in the summer by mainly bringing in kids - we need players for the now
You both may well be correct. I have no doubt that our style of play contributes to injuries and Ange is also to blame for green lighting our poor transfer window.Our team is not the 11th best in the league. Ange is massively under-performing. He has underperformed since an incredible start, we have consistently gone downhill over a long period. Our players look shattered, regularly end up with injuries likely related to the style/training, and almost nobody has developed or improved under him. It is fucking shocking.
Sorry but anyone not seeing that the style is an issue is just being ignorant now. That game epitomised why it is an issue. At 2-0 we were constantly throwing ourselves at Chelsea players and leaving huge gaps when we didn't need to. The constant full tilt, high risk stuff works at lower levels but there has to be more nuance.
Chelsea have better footballers than us. No doubt. But their LB slipped twice and gave us an early 2-0 lead in our backyard. What did we do? We played like we were 3 down. Our players throw themselves around like they're on crack. That's coaching 100%.
We have players with physical/technical tools who have not developed their footballing brain one iota under Ange, in fact they have become thicker, probably because they're buying his absolutist all or nothing bullshit.
Our team is not the 11th best in the league. Ange is massively under-performing. He has underperformed since an incredible start, we have consistently gone downhill over a long period. Our players look shattered, regularly end up with injuries likely related to the style/training, and almost nobody has developed or improved under him. It is fucking shocking.
Sorry but anyone not seeing that the style is an issue is just being ignorant now. That game epitomised why it is an issue. At 2-0 we were constantly throwing ourselves at Chelsea players and leaving huge gaps when we didn't need to. The constant full tilt, high risk stuff works at lower levels but there has to be more nuance.
Chelsea have better footballers than us. No doubt. But their LB slipped twice and gave us an early 2-0 lead in our backyard. What did we do? We played like we were 3 down. Our players throw themselves around like they're on crack. That's coaching 100%.
We have players with physical/technical tools who have not developed their footballing brain one iota under Ange, in fact they have become thicker, probably because they're buying his absolutist all or nothing bullshit.
Sounds legitUnrelated.. But if Pep leaves at the end of his contract in 2026. Are we still worried about them sniffing around Ange? We were told a lot about that a lot about a year or so ago by Neville and the brain trust at Talksport and such. I'm just wondering where we're all at with that.
He's a gaslighting narcissist."We were in control of the game...." We were never in control of the fucking game! What planet does he live on?
Yes, we were two up at one stage, but not a single Spurs fan felt comfy and 'in control' at any stage of that match.
Whilst there is an element of truth to what you're saying, I don't think you've quite hit the nail on the head here.
How was today (i thought you werent going to watch it btw) absolutist all or nothing football?
At 2-0 we were still more playing on the counter than some kind of suicidal high line.
Sancho scored with pur entire defense in front of him.
Am I missing what happened here?
mmmate -surely you;re joking/jestingLooks like I'm the only one left on here who is Ange in...
Happy to take abuse for this- but I think the risky style of play is not the problem, but the lack of investment in the squad. Too many mediocre players and not enough depth.
He could be great at the likes of City imo.
Like I said, his style of play is based on maximizing the variance factor and overcoming the opposition through sheer individual brilliance of his players. It doesn't matter how many chances you give, if you simply have much better players that would convert their chances at a higher rate than the opposition. To formalize it:
1) Create no less xG (how this is calculated is irrelevant here) than opposition
2) Convert those xG into actual goals at a higher rate than opposition -thanks to much higher quality of players-
3) Profit
Isn't this the definition of being chequebook though? You know, the term people use in criticising the likes of Guardiola? Don't the same people argue that he would be a colossal failure with a "normal" team ? Well we essentially got ourselves a budget Guardiola then. People optimistic about Ange seems to be making this point.
"Give him what Pep has, and watch him destroy anything coming his way!"
The obvious question is why? Why would he (and not anyone else) enjoy this kind of a privilege? Is it because he's already here? Is it because Celtic gave it to him once and it seemed to work in Scottish League? What's the argument here? You're essentially admitting that he's not capable of creating a whole bigger than the sum of its parts, he needs all stars to be aligned for his approach to work. That's the exact opposite of how this club operates though. That's the issue.
mmmate -surely you;re joking/jesting
lack of investment -since 2022- we are (top) 3rd on the spending-list
the people who are not spending are Forest, brighton & Bmouth - as examples
* Risky angeball caused to many giveaways and hammies
* ange hand picked several of the 'mediocre' ones which you are alluding to
how much more investment do you want? 500M and 2 more seasons?
Coaches have nothing to do with transfers. Sure, they may have the final yes/no decision, but they don't go out scouting players - there is an entire department doing this.
We have always had injury problems at the club. Mourinho's squad had lost all of our best players to injury. How many times did Kane break at the crucial moment?
Meanwhile, in Liverpool's best seasons Van Dyke, Alex Arnold, Salah and Robertson played almost every minute of every game, playing a similar high pace style.
My suspicion is that we are not pumping our players with the same *ahem* supplements some of the other clubs are using and we get more injuries because of it.
I'm still with you mate.Looks like I'm the only one left on here who is Ange in...
Happy to take abuse for this- but I think the risky style of play is not the problem, but the lack of investment in the squad. Too many mediocre players and not enough depth.
There was a lot more work to do with those two goals than the two mindless pens we gifted them...Oh so what if it was. They literally handed us a 2-0 lead because their lb had the wrong boots on and was slipping everywhere, and we still fucked it..
170 for those three my goodness. I rate solanke, simpatize with Brennan and think richarlison is not a bad player, but they are worth half of that but sign of our imbecile recruitmentLack of investment? No, just bad investment. Solanke, Rich, BJ that’s a 170M forward line. Werner is on 170 grand a week.
We can’t keep pretending we don’t spend a lot.
It could still be a possibility, City just need to be found guilty and relegated 6 divisionsUnrelated.. But if Pep leaves at the end of his contract in 2026. Are we still worried about them sniffing around Ange? We were told a lot about that a lot about a year or so ago by Neville and the brain trust at Talksport and such. I'm just wondering where we're all at with that.
I think the point might be that we spent a lot on transfers, but didn’t get top quality. Probably because we don’t spend a lot on transfers AND wages. It’s one or the other. We spent for the future. I quite like who we bought (biss is pissing me off), but our squad isn’t good enough yet.mmmate -surely you;re joking/jesting
lack of investment -since 2022- we are (top) 3rd on the spending-list
the people who are not spending are Forest, brighton & Bmouth - as examples
* Risky angeball caused to many giveaways and hammies
* ange hand picked several of the 'mediocre' ones which you are alluding to
how much more investment do you want? 500M and 2 more seasons?
///Coaches have nothing to do with transfers. Sure, they may have the final yes/no decision, but they don't go out scouting players - there is an entire department doing this.
well you're wrong there- for ange any way.
I am sure he does his "scouting" at spurs - he also scouts watching live matches and videos.
Back in Celtic and Yokohama - he was already scouting. subsequently he targeted a few japanese players from his own club and rival clubs; His 'other department' is Levy - the cheque book dept.