Reasonable question. Accounting for 5th is difficult. It was an improvement. It was a disappointment.
I might be misremembering, but I don’t think any other club who had been in the position we were in November 2023 had ever before then failed to finish in the Top 4. That’s the disappointment part.
If I may, what do you think has changed across the two seasons ?
For me, it’s that Ange got found out and didn’t change. The players, for their part in this were and are not of good enough quality across both seasons. Had largely come from “inferior” clubs and been purchased at a compromised price.
On 5th, I just think this group over a season played to their optimum.
I also think players like Hjojberg were underrated (and not adequately replaced), and that our excellent start was not matched by many teams over a similar period at any point of the season,obviously top 4 apart. This season nothing of the sort, and it shows.
We have nothing that scares teams. Nothing. We can't dominate games, we lack experience and we are inexplicably fallible, too much of the time. It's a recipe for paucity, and it has shown.
But the players collectively are much better than 15th, and it's flawed for people to deride what is spent on players by the club based simply on us sitting 15th. That's not analysis as opposed to just looking at the table and extrapolating to suit a narrative.
Postecoglou found out? Nah. It's all fallacy. I am not even sure what that means. He and his coaching team haven't been good enough, and nearly 2 years on, it's that simple. Systems don't get beaten, but players who look poorly coached, repeating mistakes and not motivated in the right way or as needed, do.