They didn't give 100% for AngeYou simply cannot sack him now and expect the players to actually give 100% for the new manager.

The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
They didn't give 100% for AngeYou simply cannot sack him now and expect the players to actually give 100% for the new manager.
Ha, someone else spotted it..That third season line from Ange was a really calculated attempt to try and make him unsackable to Levy and the board.
Thankfully I don't see Paratici falling for Ange's preplanned bullshit. And make no mistake, that line was preplanned.
If we have anyone under our roof who won’t give 100% for a new manager, they should be sent out.You simply cannot sack him now and expect the players to actually give 100% for the new manager.
He knew exactly what he was doing.
I think the decision to sack him was pre-planned weeks ago. That's why we're hearing about the structural changes, including the removal of Scott Munn (an Australian, who brought Ange here, by the way) and the appointment of Fabio Paratici.
Sacking him now, though, would be very problematic in my opinion. Although it might be a rational decision, he's the one who gave us the best moment this club has had in about 40 years. Just look at the parade today — it was bouncing.
Football is all about emotion. Sacking the man who brought that emotion is causing division among the fanbase and also among the players. It would take a top hire, like Inzaghi, to get everyone on board again.
That's why Levy is in a tough spot now. If Paratici comes in, I think Ange is 100% gone. But if Levy suddenly goes with the vibes, rejects Paratici, and meddles with Vinai, it would show his incompetence and reactionary nature.
Ange knows this and is applying pressure with statements like that. He knows that suddenly, momentum is with him. The next few days will be interesting for sure.
We have two full years of data about what happens when Ange lines up against decent opponents
1 PPG
And that figure was buoyed by a fast start last year that never was duplicated
It will only take a couple of games of the same old shit for people to realize retaining him based on the vibes was a titanic mistake, but by that time it will be too late.
Have we agreed on that all year long?A lot of them need to be shipped out!
Everyone has agreed all year long that the squad isn't near good enough.
He's trying to keep his job. Mystery solved.
It just doesn't work like that.
Come on man, the players finished 17th under Ange. Do you really think they think Ange is the only manager they can play under?
Its funnyWell, if you care about the PL. Then we SHOULD sack him.
Other managers already have him figured out. Unless he changes his whole philosophy, there is no way we can get top 4 next season with Ange.
No rational person would ever disagreeing with you .
But :
Given the tidal-wave of emotion hitting this Club right now ; it would take the person who shot Bambi’s Mother to sack Ange now . Not impossible; but imagine the pressure the next poor sod would be under …
Incredible as it may seem: Ange has to stay ; to do otherwise would be a leap too far for Danny Boy .
I don't have a problem with that. I was just replying to a poster who reckons Postecoglou put all his eggs in the Europa League basket, when in fact he also had a go at winning the Carabao Cup, so his statement wasn't correct.Luckily for us LFC we’re playing in a different casino .
You can only beat who’s in front of you in knock-out football; we did that. And won a European trophy fir the first time in 41 years .
What exactly is your problem accepting that fact ?
I don't have a problem with that. I was just replying to a poster who reckons Postecoglou put all his eggs in the Europa League basket, when in fact he also had a go at winning the Carabao Cup, so his statement wasn't correct.
It’s revisionist to put it kindly.I don't have a problem with that. I was just replying to a poster who reckons Postecoglou put all his eggs in the Europa League basket, when in fact he also had a go at winning the Carabao Cup, so his statement wasn't correct.
100%. we are soft when it comes to being ruthless and cutting people. this aint the business where being soft works out.I am afraid we won't be ruthless enough to sack him even when - in my humble opinion - we still should do it. Same pattern was applied already in the past when it comes to not getting rid of some players (took to long with Dele, Eriksen, Lloris, Davies should not be there as well etc). We are too nice in this area compared to our opponents.
hes positioned himself so that the club cant come out with that now.He will leave on mutual terms. It will be carefully worded. "The club have today made the decision to mutually part ways with Ange Postecoglu. He has our utmost thanks for delivering one of the most special nights in our history, however the board feel that the league campaign didn't come close to meeting expectations and the club has decided a change is needed to give us the best possible chance of success in the coming season"
If Ange were to stay I struggle to see how the next EPL season would be any different. We’d still see the same poor training, the same lack of tactical awareness and presumably the same win/loss ratios. And we won’t win the Champions League.
So thanks Ange, but your time here is done.
Ange should stay because his 1 PPG is enough to keep us up? What kind of talk is this? Now of all times we should have aspirations, we are not the Spam, satisfied if we don’t go downEven 1ppg will be enough to keep us up next season
If Ange delivers more silverware in the shape of a league, FA cup or champions league hell even the super cup and good runs in the league and other cup competitions ill take it over your negativity all day long