• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
I do wish we had some clarity. Winning the Europa was a thrilling, unexpected, bonus after, what has been, a disastrous league campaign.

If Ange stays, can he turn our league form around? I'm fucked if I know.

If he goes, is there any guarantee that a new manager will do any better? I'm fucked if I know.

We won nothing under a parade of, commonly viewed as, 'elite' managers and won a major European trophy under a, commonly viewed on this forum as, clueless fraud. Does any of that give any sense of what might happen if Ange stays, or goes? I'm fucked if I know.

If Ange stays, he will have my support because I have supported this club for nearly 65 years through thick and thin, and always will.

If he goes, I will support the new Manager to do well because I have supported this club for nearly 65 years through thick and thin, and always will.

In short, what will happen? I'm fucked if I know.
 
Last edited:
What’s wrong with that analogy?!

I’m trying to point out that him finishing 5th was heavily influenced by the initial circumstances (the new car being reliable), which failed to continue (car older and now breaking down regularly) and cannot be relied upon as what to expect moving forward!

Your analogies are horrible, please stop trying to do them, they just don't work

Once again 'heavily influenced' is an utter BS argument unless you're willing to use the same logic for every manager in the league who goes through a rich vein of form.

It's very easy to point out and ignore certain factors as to why to why certain teams hit/lose form throughout the season e.g injuries, players hitting form, referees, fixture schedule etc... you could literally do this for every other team in the league hence why we take an overall approach when it's all said and done you end up where you deserve at the end of the season.
 
Yep. To some extent I can understand why someone like Levy, who is famously clueless about football, may make the mistake of giving Ange another season.

But is is unfamothable that a football person like Paratici, and even Vinai, would make the same mistake.

If they come in, and give Ange a third season, Ange will without a doubt fuck it up. We will finish midtable at best, relegated at worst, and we will crash out of the CL in embarassing fashion. I can't imagine they would want their debut season, tarred in such a way.

It will be interesting to see, because if we sack Ange, my faith in the club will be higher, I will have more optimism for our future.

If Ange is kept, I will be extremely disillusioned, even more so because it means our new football structure has signed off on it and it will mean even the new guys are clueless.

This is such an important cross roads for our club.

Sack Ange, hire the right manager, and build on last week and the CL qualification, and we can really go places.

Keep Ange, and next season will be a disaster and we will lose our chance, and fall even further behindn than we already are.

On SC it's even worse, so many absolute morons ignoring all the evidence and wanting Ange to get another season based on nothing but they like him, bending over backwards to make every excuse possible on why the season was so shit, apart from admitting it was because Ange is useless. it's insane.
SC is a site full of brain dead numpties who believe and pay for ITK bullshit so we can ignore their thoughts.
It’s bad enough we get their forum wankstains on here trolling we can only imagine the nonsense the rest of those muppets are spouting.
 
No one’s arguing it’s a cast iron fact, but to keep using it as a means to endorse going forward with the manager without applying context to that 5th place finish is foolish!

What’s hard to understand in that concept?!

I'm sorry who has done this and what context do you need to fucking apply to a 5th place finish ffs...stop trying to argue with facts, you're being thick.
 
Not surprised to see this thread full of Ange haters that post massively the same again and again. Whenever someone dares to have a different opinion he gets personal attacks and insults.
 
Once again 'heavily influenced' is an utter BS argument unless you're willing to use the same logic for every manager in the league who goes through a rich vein of form.
You’d have a point if the rich vein of form was anything other than right at the start of his tenure. AngeBall was a new concept to the premier league and it initially caught teams out, but it turned out to be surprisingly easy to overcome.

I think it was Gary O’Neil who gave a detailed interview on the tactics that were used to nullify AngeBall and it’s a blueprint that every manager has used since.
 
I'm sorry who has done this and what context do you need to fucking apply to a 5th place finish ffs...stop trying to argue with facts, you're being thick.
It’s pretty self explanatory (to someone moderately intelligent) what I’m claiming and it’s that the fifth place finish in 23/24 is not indicative of Ange’s ability as Harry7 keeps trotting out. What’s difficult to understand with that?!

Last season’s 17th place finish inidicates that, so ‘stop trying to argue with facts, you’re being thick!’ 😂
 
You’d have a point if the rich vein of form was anything other than right at the start of his tenure. AngeBall was a new concept to the premier league and it initially caught teams out, but it turned out to be surprisingly easy to overcome.

I think it was Gary O’Neil who gave a detailed interview on the tactics that were used to nullify AngeBall and it’s a blueprint that every manager has used since.

Sorry what difference does it make when teams hit form?

The narrative that he got 'found out' after those first 10 matches is a load of crap. What happened is that our key players who were performing at a high level (Maddison/VDV) got injured for 3 months, Romero got suspended, Udogie/Rich, Perisic were hurt and subsequently we dropped points, we didn't start drop points due to tactics, we started to drop points due to being considerably weakened.

If he got 'found out' after the first 10 then we wouldn't have won half our matches from round 10 to round 20, we lost form because we lost key players and struggled to recover.

Now before you say anything our key players came back towards the end of the season and we were poor which was completely on the manager however anyone who suggests that the manager got found out ignoring the context of key personnel going missing during that period either have a shit memory or just lying to themselves because it doesn't fit their confirmation bias about the manager.
 
Last edited:
It’s pretty self explanatory (to someone moderately intelligent) what I’m claiming and it’s that the fifth place finish in 23/24 is not indicative of Ange’s ability as Harry7 keeps trotting out. What’s difficult to understand with that?!

Last season’s 17th place finish inidicates that, so ‘stop trying to argue with facts, you’re being thick!’ 😂

Fine and that 5th place should not be taken in isolation because you can't ignore what happened this season.

If anything what you're saying that over the course of 2 seasons going by the mean Ange is a mid table manager, if you're happy to swap him with another mid table manager who haven't managed to win silverware then okay then sure...

What I'm debating is people trying to discount the first 10 and using all sorts of mental gymnastics to justify their bogus arguments.
 
It’s pretty self explanatory (to someone moderately intelligent) what I’m claiming and it’s that the fifth place finish in 23/24 is not indicative of Ange’s ability as Harry7 keeps trotting out. What’s difficult to understand with that?!

Last season’s 17th place finish inidicates that, so ‘stop trying to argue with facts, you’re being thick!’ 😂
Sir, I salute your indefatigability but you may as well be trying to argue with a brick wall.
 
I really don't understand this obsession with labelling Ange a fraud.

He came to our club stating time and time again that he 'always' wins in his second season.....and he delivered....what is fraudulant about him??!
will smith mib GIF
 
Sorry what difference does it make when teams hit form?

The narrative that he got 'found out' after those first 10 matches is a load of crap. What happened is that our key players who were performing at a high level (Maddison/VDV) got injured for 3 months, Romero got suspended, Udogie/Rich, Perisic were hurt and subsequently we dropped points, we didn't start drop points due to tactics, we started to drop points due to being considerably weakened.

If he got 'found out' after the first 10 then we wouldn't have won half our matches from round 10 to round 20, we lost form because we lost key players and struggled to recover.

Now before you say anything our key players came back towards the end of the season and we were poor which was completely on the manager however anyone who suggests that the manager got found out ignoring the context of key personnel going missing during that period either have a shit memory or just lying to themselves because it doesn't fit their confirmation bias about the manager.
A top manager finds solutions when injuries occur. Ange can't do that as he's not a good manager. He only has one way and either it works or it don't. In the premier league it doesn't work. And a system only working for 10 games is a shitty system.

Now it only works against weak teams in Europa league. Even low league teams nearly but us this year. Zara cashiers were destroying Ange ball. At that point you should've realized.
 
Back
Top