Alisson signed on very similar wages to Lloris and then doubled them within 2 years and Lloris stayed the same.
Virgil’s first full season with Liverpool was on 180k pw which is massive now let alone back then. Romero is on 180 now…
If you compare the total cost of transfers in terms of wages and transfer fee, Virgil, Alisson and Salah vs Lloris, Son and Romero, it’s just silly and you are making yourself look silly to reinforce a point that isn’t a point.
No, no, I'm not. You were not comparing them to US - you said they were paid what the TOP players were getting. Not spurs - but the top. My point was that they didn't spend what the top teams were on wages, and still arent BUYING players - bar one on wages that the top teams are.
Allison and Salah were categorically not signed in line with the very top wages at the time.
VVD was. That is one player - They did not win the league by constantly matching the top teams for wages or even fees.
People have constantly been talking about transfer fees being a red herring, and WAGES being the marker for people to be successful - I can find you countless posts saying this.
Liverpool have shown that is not true - Woolwich have shown that is not true, United have shown that is not true, Chelsea have shown that is not true.
What is true is that it is multifaceted and requires a number of things to happen. Well-paid players are one, sure, but so is a squad built together as a squad with a coach that fits the squad they have - you need your best players to stay injury free too and also, have your closest footballing rivals slip up.