Is he actually any good?
Feels very much like another plodder in the PEH mould
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Yes I do , but I also admit that statement is way less disingenuous than the ambition one . Winning is very hard , even harder though if you don’t fully commit
Close to 250k a week I believe. He's getting his wages bumped up by around 200k. Hence why he only wants to go there and why everyone else backed off as its bad business signing a player for 60-70m and then paying them around 12m a year in wages. You only do that for world class players, not decent premier league level players who still need to make the next step.
I get he’s got Frank’s trust and is a good character, but I’ve never watched Brentford once and thought he’s anything other than a bog standard Scandi water carrier. Selling Hojbjerg and then buying him would be 2 steps forward, one step back. Frank’s gotta aim higher.
Yet they gave much better teams than us tough matches and took scalps. I think, like boxing, styles make fights, and we were just a tough fit for them.none of the Brentford players stood out much when we played them last season tbh. Mbeumo scored a nice volley against us i recall, but apart from that it was pretty much lite work up against their players. They all were rather mid
Yet they gave much better teams than us tough matches and took scalps. I think, like boxing, styles make fights, and we were just a tough fit for them.
I try never to bullshit so here goesWhat was the context of the "winning is hard" statement, where can I find it?
They sold Mane to Bayern for €32m
They signed Diaz for €47m
Diaz wages were lower but the transfer fee almost certainly made the total transfer cost the same or higher
I have no idea , it was widely attributed to him on here . I will admit to bias that means I then did not research the origin of that statement. Therefore I am in the somewhat unfortunate position that I am reliant on one of the original posters to provide said context .
I try never to bullshit so here goes
I have no idea , it was widely attributed to him on here . I will admit to bias that means I then did not research the origin of that statement. Therefore I am in the somewhat unfortunate position that I am reliant on one of the original posters to provide said context .
I could of course spend time myself trying to find it , but I am not that arsed by someone scoring a point off me on an internet forum. I can easily live with the L if that is what it turns out to be .
Yet they gave much better teams than us tough matches and took scalps. I think, like boxing, styles make fights, and we were just a tough fit for them.
Mane was on double Diaz's wages for years, though
LOL, this is just hilarious. Youre advocating for spending more for less output as a good way to do transfers.
Madness.
Bale you'd have to pick one of the 7. Certainly Eriksen. Modric was effectively Mousa Dembele the next day.
Walker was mostly in a mood when he left because Trippier was getting some of his game time.
Berbatov was replaced with Crouch in the January.
Kane's replacement is Solanke.
Same argument can be made for a whole host of clubs, though, when picking generational talents. Certainly in Bale and Modric we're taking - comfortably - two of the top 5 players in their positions this century.
To compare, you'd ask who Real Madrid have replaced them with. The answer really is that you can't replace Modric - but Dembele was also one of our best central midfielders so it didn't work out too badly.
You don't really magically replace the likes of Bale or Kane like-for-like, because they were unique players not playing a defined position
Are you saying Liverpool get less output from their transfers from us?
You are obsessed with Mane to Diaz as the one that maybe balanced out total transfer cost. I’m not sure but either way, it’s very clear their model is nothing like ours when most of their transfers have bigger total transfer costs than the outgoing player and they are serial winners where Levy isn’t and his model allowed them to overtake us.
Who did we sign to replace Bale, Modric, Walker, Kane, Berbatov…?
Were they for a similar or higher total transfer cost than the player we sold?
If we sell Romero this summer, are we replacing him with a players who’s total transfer cost equals or exceeds the amount we sell him for and get off our books for wages?
I never said he never said it . I said a number of people posted it and I did not independently research its origin . So in this instance you are making stuff up . Now if nobody posts the quote and it’s context , then I have attributed something to Levy he did not say . However the jury ain’t in yet so a bit early to grandstandSo after all this time, he never actually said it and you've just ran with it? lol Just typical isn't it of the anti ENIC arguments on here, I should have known.
Anyway in regards to his statement about his desire to win, every chairman wants to win the big prizes eventually, I don't believe they're in it to lose as it doesn't make any business sense however everyone has different priorities and we know ENIC priorities isn't football, it's purely investment.
I think he's in it for the long haul, real estate first, football second.
I can’t believe the whinging on social media that Eze is not what we need. I don’t think people realise how mental our schedule is.