Kristeva
beat me to the punch. To be honest, Brooks is the one I’d take from Bournemouth. King is more versatile, but again, I think we’ve got into this mindset where we’re only allowed to play Kane until his annual injury.
Maybe it’s because I’ve been reading my Joy of Sex manual and transported back to the early 1980s, but I’ve been taken by the idea of 4/4/2 with a pair of strikers that compliment one another.
Everything goes in cycles.
Yesterday I read a article saying that the 4-3-3 could become outdated anytime soon. I think it´s early to say - and even if it does represent a tendency for the majority of the teams, if you can buy all the top players in the world (like City or Madrid), you could play with a 4-3-3 forever.
But the 4-4-2 has definitely returned. Simeone was the first to show how the system could still work at the highest possible level. Basically, without the ball his side went from a 4-4-2 to a 4-4-2-0 (I´m not joking).
The premise is that the strikers are able to close the space between the CB´s and the midfield passing options - usually represented by a single DM in the 4-3-3. The duo becomes part of a square with the two CM´s, while the wingers and full-backs press together on the sides.
Everybody is involved, no more disadvantage in midfield.
João Sacramento is obviously a big fan of the system. And Jose is known for the 4-2-3-1 - basically a variation from it. That´s why I´m saying we are going to play with a double pivot next season. That´s why, in these last few games, as soon as we went ahead Jose moved Sissoko alongside Winks - forming the second line of four alongside the two wingers, leaving two players up front.
Against Woolwich, we started with the 4-4-2. Lo Celso-Winks as CM´s, Sissoko and Lucas closing the sides, and finally, Son and Kane up front. It definitely worked.
The striker we are signing should be able to play in this role, alongside Kane. Also to play as a single striker, in Kane´s place. And also to be an impact substitute when we are chasing results.