Yes, but you can just say Alf Ramsey won a World Cup and managed 112 more matches to support the argument that he's better than Big Sam.
........ If we're talking facts, wasnt it West Haaaaaammm that really won the world Cup ?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Yes, but you can just say Alf Ramsey won a World Cup and managed 112 more matches to support the argument that he's better than Big Sam.
Which is exactly why stats need a level of context hence my Big Sam point.Yes, but you can just say Alf Ramsey won a World Cup and managed 112 more matches to support the argument that he's better than Big Sam.
Winks haters now resorting to imaginary cunting.I mean he's a liability with his tackling specifically. He's dangerous. He could easily have had a number of red cards and, given our ropey defence, I don't like players giving away free kicks in our half.
You sound excited by that big Sam win percentage there buddy. Maybe you'd appreciate Winks a little more if you were previously aware that he currently has a 90% win ratio in appearances for England. A tidy ratio for goal contributions to boot!England win percentage with Big Sam
100 %
England win percentage with Alf Ramsey
61 %
Simple as.
Lol I'm pulling your leg I seriously didn't rate him. Watched at Saints against us live like three times watched three times for us. I just didn't get it. Not going to lie. However I am confident my championing of Tanguy when a large posse want him run out of town more than makes up for it.Your memory is playing tricks! I said that Matt Le Tissier said that he didn't think PEH was the player that would take us to the next level, but that he may improve with better players. I wouldn't make such an assessment on a player I knew nothing about. I admit I wasn't too impressed by him on his debut (don't think anyone was) but think he has become a key player for us in a relatively short time.
Wipe his cum out of your eyes and watch him try to tackle.Winks haters now resorting to imaginary cunting.
When Vinicius has been involved in any game we have a 83% win percentage. With Kane that number drops to 60% this season.England win percentage with Big Sam
100 %
England win percentage with Alf Ramsey
61 %
Simple as.
"There are lies damn lies and statistics"When Vinicius has been involved in any game we have a 83% win percentage. With Kane that number drops to 60% this season.
You've literally made up a scenario to have a dig at him.Wipe his cum out of your eyes and watch him try to tackle.
Have you ever watched a game before?You've literally made up a scenario to have a dig at him.
I have, and never seen him sent off.Have you ever watched a game before?
As someone asked:
Win percentage of league games involving Harry Winks starting since 2018/19:
50%
Win percentage of league games in which Harry Winks hasn't started since 2018/19:
49%
Show me where I said he'd been sent off?I have, and never seen him sent off.
You are criticising him for multiple sending offs when he has zero.
You believe in magic.
You really do need to factor in that a significant amount of occasions the win was only achieved after substituting off Winks with us drawing or even losing, and turning them into wins without him. Think as obvious example Villa at home, 1 down with him on, replace him with Eriksen, win 3-1
And on the reverse side have been a few games where we have been winning where he didn't start (for example we brought him on at 3 up against West Ham) where he has not helped us, and in that game hindered us in holding out, and helped turn a certain win, into something else.
The occasions where he has had the opposite effect (bring him on and we get something out of it, or take him off from winning position and we don't win, are few and far between)
I believe that on points per game of all our players last season, for the period they were on pitch (i.e. take the goals scored/conceded purely for period they were on pitch), only Tanganga fared worse than Winks.
If my aunt had bollocks, she'd be my uncle.Show me where I said he'd been sent off?
I said something along the lines of him being lucky to have never been sent off because his tackles are dirty, dangerous clumsy and generally embarassing.
That’s because we’ve been dogshit in central midfield ever since dembele left (although PEH is an improvement). So whether or not he’s playing, he’s just replaced by another mediocre player.As someone asked:
Win percentage of league games involving Harry Winks starting since 2018/19:
50%
Win percentage of league games in which Harry Winks hasn't started since 2018/19:
49%
You really do need to factor in that a significant amount of occasions the win was only achieved after substituting off Winks with us drawing or even losing, and turning them into wins without him. Think as obvious example Villa at home, 1 down with him on, replace him with Eriksen, win 3-1
And on the reverse side have been a few games where we have been winning where he didn't start (for example we brought him on at 3 up against West Ham) where he has not helped us, and in that game hindered us in holding out, and helped turn a certain win, into something else.
The occasions where he has had the opposite effect (bring him on and we get something out of it, or take him off from winning position and we don't win, are few and far between)
I believe that on points per game of all our players last season, for the period they were on pitch (i.e. take the goals scored/conceded purely for period they were on pitch), only Tanganga fared worse than Winks.
So therefore the wins with Winks starting, where Winks was on the pitch whilst we were winning is 3 games so roughly 5% less than you stated, so c. 45%,
and wins without him would be 4 games, so about 7% higher so c. 56% then ?