Because we're talking about the decision making process last year prior to us winning the Cup.
If being in Europe was a valid case for keeping the manager then, then it should also be now.
I'm not totally sure you're actually reading what I'm writing, I'm not justifying keeping him, I want him to go, but by the logic we applied last year then he should be left in post until all trophy winning avenues have been exhausted surely?
I don't know why you keep saying this, either you're ignoring the obvious point or you're being totally disingenuous.
Last season we were favourites to win the EL, even from the start of the competition we were seen as the most equipped team to win the competition. now whether you think keeping or sacking Ange would have helped or hindered us in that respect that was enough grounds to keeping him in the job whether you like it or not and as I said the decision was entirely justified as we ended up winning it anyway.
So just merely being in Europe isn't a valid case unless you actually think we're going to win the Champions League or you think we are even somewhere amongst the favourites to win it, we're not and by keeping Frank in the job all you're doing is hurting us domestically and prolonging the inevitable because there will be no rewards from it come the end of the season.
And Ange at the very least had more grounds to keep his job, at the very least you could point to his 5th place finish, you could point to the underlying numbers which are far better than Frank's, you could even point to the fact that we reached the Semi of the Carabao and beat Utd and City in the process meaning there was still at least a bit of fight in the team, slim pickings obviously but there are clear differences between last season and this season.
It's not the same logic, it's not the same standard and it's not anywhere near the same circumstance, this is a nothing argument.