• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
You don't have a clue what people want to read more than not. Most people who come on here just read and don't post...... and even people posting more negativity is pretty much par for rhe course in any online forum or social media. Of course there are more people posting negatively about the Manager right now.

Again you don't want to read what I or others have to say, you don't have to. It's in your hands.

I didn’t say I do. But you will continue to be getting angry, frustrated replies if you decide to be a contrarian. So don’t complain about people on here being angry and frustrated.
 

Ange Postecoglou 'is facing an FA probe' after claiming 'things weren't equal' over controversial refereeing decisions in Tottenham's loss to Newcastle​

  • Postecoglou was furious at Anthony Gordon's goal after a Joelinton handball
  • Tottenham boss could be investigated by the FA over his post-match comments
  • SOCCER A-Z: Listen now wherever you get your podcasts, or watch on YouTube. New episodes every Wednesday
By ABDI RASHID

Published: 17:27 GMT, 5 January 2025 |


Ange Postecoglou is reportedly facing an FA probe over his comments following Tottenham's 2-1 home defeat by Newcastle.

Spurs continued their poor form as they suffered a 10th league defeat of the season and Postecoglou was left aggrieved by some of referee Andrew Madley's decisions.

His sense of injustice revolved around Newcastle's first goal, an equaliser scored by Anthony Gordon after the ball clearly struck Joelinton on the hand as he blocked a pass.

Referee Madley did not see an offence and it was not overruled by the VAR Chris Kavanagh because Joelinton's hand was in a natural position and the contact was ruled to be accidental.

Postecoglou said after the game: 'On the balance of play, any balance you want with all things being equal, we would have won today. Things weren't equal and balanced.'

When pushed by the reporter on what decisions he particularly disagreed with, the 59-year-old lashed out.

'You can talk about whatever you want,' he said. 'You want my opinion - if all things were equal and balanced we would have won.'

As reported by the Mirror, Postecoglou could be in trouble, though managers are allowed to express opinions on referees and decisions if they don't hint at bias or question an official's integrity.

The FA have not launched a full investigation yet but want to know what Postecoglou meant with his comments.

If the Australian admits his comments were directed at the referee, he could face a touchline ban or a fined.

Tottenham were incensed when a foul was awarded against Dan Burn for a similar handball offence as the game escaped them. Alexander Isak scored Newcastle's winner.
why would Spurs have won ? the decision around the hand ball wasn't late in the game.
 
Have you actually tried it in a match?. You have to follow the run of the winger, you have to stay onside, you have to time your run so that you can put precisely your foot on the ball coming at right angles to your run -too early and it goes behind, too late and its past you. You than have to change the direction of the ball to hit the target. Its far harder than it looks.
that sounds feasible... but these chaps do get paid tens of thousands of pounds a week to stick their foot out while running ..they probably practice it as well.
 
Last edited:
You're LITERALLY doing that now.

Being someone that gets angry and frustrated doesn't give any more weight to the points being written. It isn't any more a valid way to post than any other way.

As always, you don't like it, put me on ignore. But you do kinda like it cos it give you something to take out your frustration on.

Hilariously my surname is Levy and I'm incredibly bald.

All this started from a simple question about our injury crisis which he took out of context and the proceeded to have the mother of a meltdowns acting like the leader of the Ange out mob trying to dictate what can and cannot be posted in a neutral thread might I add...attempting to shut down free speech and labelling it trolling just because he doesn't agree with it.

Just skip past the fucking posts if you don't like the content...absolutely bizarre behaviour, what the hell is this place coming to? 😆
 
All this started from a simple question about our injury crisis which he took out of context and the proceeded to have the mother of a meltdowns acting like the leader of the Ange out mob trying to dictate what can and cannot be posted in a neutral thread might I add...attempting to shut down free speech and labelling it trolling just because he doesn't agree with it.

Just skip past the fucking posts if you don't like the content...absolutely bizarre behaviour, what the hell is this place coming to? 😆

I've been skipping a fair few posts on here of late.

The fucking doom and gloom of all it.
 
I don't know about "most people" or "this thread" but I think most Tottenham fans support the team and the club through this difficult period and know that sacking the manager now would be a bush league move.

Nah mate this can't be right, you have to be trolling or just being a complete contrarian to actually want the manager to turn this around and get behind the team...we can't be having fans actually daring to support the club through thick and thin can we...perish the thought :porrohands:
 
It's alright saying that in favour of keeping him, but how many of those players would be kicking off wanting to move to clubs in the CL come the summer window?

If they love him and this is them playing for him then isn't that even more damning of his managerial capabilities? Like we just have a chilled our entertainer at the helm who the workforce loves, but is actually dreadful at his job?
Surely the effort they put is what you would expect of them anyway? That is minimum requirement.
 

Ange Postecoglou 'is facing an FA probe' after claiming 'things weren't equal' over controversial refereeing decisions in Tottenham's loss to Newcastle​

  • Postecoglou was furious at Anthony Gordon's goal after a Joelinton handball
  • Tottenham boss could be investigated by the FA over his post-match comments
  • SOCCER A-Z: Listen now wherever you get your podcasts, or watch on YouTube. New episodes every Wednesday
By ABDI RASHID

Published: 17:27 GMT, 5 January 2025 |


Ange Postecoglou is reportedly facing an FA probe over his comments following Tottenham's 2-1 home defeat by Newcastle.

Spurs continued their poor form as they suffered a 10th league defeat of the season and Postecoglou was left aggrieved by some of referee Andrew Madley's decisions.

His sense of injustice revolved around Newcastle's first goal, an equaliser scored by Anthony Gordon after the ball clearly struck Joelinton on the hand as he blocked a pass.

Referee Madley did not see an offence and it was not overruled by the VAR Chris Kavanagh because Joelinton's hand was in a natural position and the contact was ruled to be accidental.

Postecoglou said after the game: 'On the balance of play, any balance you want with all things being equal, we would have won today. Things weren't equal and balanced.'

When pushed by the reporter on what decisions he particularly disagreed with, the 59-year-old lashed out.

'You can talk about whatever you want,' he said. 'You want my opinion - if all things were equal and balanced we would have won.'

As reported by the Mirror, Postecoglou could be in trouble, though managers are allowed to express opinions on referees and decisions if they don't hint at bias or question an official's integrity.

The FA have not launched a full investigation yet but want to know what Postecoglou meant with his comments.

If the Australian admits his comments were directed at the referee, he could face a touchline ban or a fined.

Tottenham were incensed when a foul was awarded against Dan Burn for a similar handball offence as the game escaped them. Alexander Isak scored Newcastle's winner.
He obviously meant “if we had a fit team, no sickness ……….”

😜
 
Cup team this year. Every fan always said they'd happily finish in the bottom half if it meant winning a trophy and that they were sick of us always only targetting top 4. Well here you are. You made a deal with the devil and this is the journey to that elusive trophy!
Not every fan! You have only joined since Sept 24 and come on here as if you know everything. Who said our target was as a cup team this year. Only reason you are saying that now is bcos of the horrendous league form. Which of you had been on here last season would have realised our league form has been in a nose dive since Nov 23. Look at how many goals we let last year. This guy has the worst record in 27 years. Now you come on and say we should accept all of this and just look for a cup. The goalposts have changed. Ange said last season too 4 was not good enough and this season he’s wanted to for the top spot. Well that has worked out well.
 
I think it's a bit harsh. For example, they win 4-0 against Everton, 4-1 against West Ham, 4-0 against City away and yet every time any random 11 does well Ange completely changes the starting team midweek and at the next weekend. If we're looking to win 7 games in a row, I'd suggest not changing any winning team that we randomly stumble upon because if I was a player in that team I'd be lost myself.

That's called rotation bro, unless you expect him to play the same eleven every 3 days which I guess is feasible if we actually had the players available but leads to burn out...that's why you have a squad in the first place.

Besides all that during that period we had Son, Solanke, Odobert, Van Der Ven, Vicario all go down with injuries anyway so we couldn't play the same 11 every match.
 
Last edited:
Of course I know you didn't make it up. It was a fad in the 60's, 70's and 80's in particular that a lot of migrants of European descent would change their names due to the xenophobia suffered by white Australians at that time (obviously at that time, most of Australia was of British descent). He decided to change it back as an adult because he was proud of his family and who he was, and where he was from. Insult a manager's ability all you like, but saying he's a charlatan and that other nonsense is vile.

And offensive on my part? My family are of Italian heritage and forced to do the same thing at that time, so maybe stop being an ignorant bigot, and if you want to criticise someone do it on their ability as a coach rather than where they are from, cockhead.
So the Aussies were xenophobic towards your family. Take your bitterness out on them then and not on me. I've forced nobody to change his name. Just posted out that his name is Postekos. Ok, he changed name and it's his family name. Fine, that explains it. Wonder why the rest of his family didn't change their name back, though. They can't have found it as offensive.
 
So the Aussies were xenophobic towards your family. Take your bitterness out on them then and not on me. I've forced nobody to change his name. Just posted out that his name is Postekos. Ok, he changed name and it's his family name. Fine, that explains it. Wonder why the rest of his family didn't change their name back, though. They can't have found it as offensive.
Lol at the backtracking, you called him a charlatan and said he was a fake and masquerading as someone else. Whatever mate.
 
So the Aussies were xenophobic towards your family. Take your bitterness out on them then and not on me. I've forced nobody to change his name. Just posted out that his name is Postekos. Ok, he changed name and it's his family name. Fine, that explains it. Wonder why the rest of his family didn't change their name back, though. They can't have found it as offensive.

Be quiet boy.
 
Back
Top