My final say on the Ange situation.
The players won't want him to be sacked as he's part of their success story this week. They will feel like one of those horrible resets that makes everyone unsettled for a while. The many lost leagues games (if you look at our GD and goals conceded) were because our whole back 5 was out for weeks and then it became clear we had no chance of getting into Europe next season, UNLESS we won the Europa, so that was the best thing to prioritise.
Unless you bring in some amazing manager that is a no-brainer choice, sacking Ange is a huge risk to everything, including the dressing room. I'm hearing Thomas Frank now, but he doesn't have the experience that Ange now has. It would be a pure gamble. How many gambles have paid off for Levy before? Frank has managed Brentford and Brondby. That's it. Ange has a better record and pedigree, and he already knows the Spurs way. How many teams beat city 4-0 at City? You have to re-read my point above about injuries and priorities to mitigate the 17th league placing.
Did Ange get backed in the transfer window before? Nope. Only Solanke and Danso - the rest were kids for the future, that Ange had to play. He also had Kane ripped out of the team for the first time in 10 years, replaced with the less than prolific Richarlison or Solanke up front. Still finished 5th that season. If Ange was clueless, it wouldn't have been 5th.
I expect Ange will get sacked, because it's a Spurs thing to do. Go through lots of loser managers at our club and still fire the one winner. When will we ever be satisfied for 5 minutes?