Err, we lost to Sporting too.The state of some "fans' here after one defeat saying one of the most successful managers in the world currently should be replaced by somebody who has never managed in Europe is shocking.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Err, we lost to Sporting too.The state of some "fans' here after one defeat saying one of the most successful managers in the world currently should be replaced by somebody who has never managed in Europe is shocking.
It's good against anyone, as it's meant to open up space in behind the opposition by drawing them forward. Against teams who are not particularly used to "dominating" possession, it is particularly effective, as they're not really structurally set up to dominate per se so, in theory at least, it should result in them being out of position more often when the counter happens.Counterattacking football is good against teams that actually have good attacks and want to dominate possession. There's only a few teams in the league we should have to play on the counter against.
He's won 2 Copa Libertadores for starters (Champions League equivalent), and a Copa Sudamericana (UEFA Cup equivalent).
The state of some "fans' here after one defeat saying one of the most successful managers in the world currently should be replaced by somebody who has never managed in Europe is shocking.
How is he more qualified than Conte to make us more successful exactly?
Why do some on here think that just because Conte is manager we should be winning every match and trophy going?
I get the concerns over playing style but FFS calm down and see where we are at the end of the season.
I don't want him gone in the slightest -The state of some "fans' here after one defeat saying one of the most successful managers in the world currently should be replaced by somebody who has never managed in Europe is shocking.
How is he more qualified than Mourhino to make us more successful exactly?
Why do some on here think that just because Conte is manager we should be winning every match and trophy going?
I get the concerns over playing style but FFS calm down and see where we are at the end of the season.
It's hard to compare but I would say, personally (as a fan), around the top 10. Maybe on par with Portugal (Remember we just got handily beaten by Sporting) and Holland.Genuinely interested in your take here.....
Where would you rank the Argentinian league in terms of world football?
Similarly where would you place River atm in terms of clubs in the world?
Equivalent in terms of structure, perhaps....... (I won't push that point any further until I hear your response to the above)
Most people on this site have a better understanding of tactics than I do, but it seems to me that Conte makes a mistake in letting attack minded teams like Woolwich just have possession. I'm still glad we have him and don't want him gone, but Saturday was extremely frustrating to watch. I had hoped he'd make a formation change at half time and put Bissouma in the middle again. He seems pretty stubborn sometimes, but that doesnt make him any different than most managers.
I was just telling my son that Conte runs a modern version of Jose ball.I don't want him gone in the slightest -
But there is a certain dejavu to the outrage that he's being questioned and the reasons why he's being questioned in the first place.
And the same defence that's put up as to why he can't be questioned is remarkably similar to what was said the last time we had what many believed to be a world class manager.
It's bloody uncanny.
Yes, I'm just correcting him.ALL comps this season:
6 wins
2 draws
2 loses
Hardly panic stations.
It's hard to compare but I would say, personally (as a fan), around the top 10. Maybe on par with Portugal (Remember we just got handily beaten by Sporting) and Holland.
The hard thing to compare is they have 28 clubs in their League.
River are current champions and lost Julian Alvarez to City so have been weakened. I'd say last season's team would be top 8 (top 6 achievable) in our League. I'd personally rate that side more than Manchester United's.
They had a player in Alvarez that currently can start for the best side in the world in Manchester City. That's the kind of quality they can achieve. They'd certainly give us a run for our money.
He is no less an ''unproven quality'' than Poch was. Than Potter is. Than Guardiola was at Barca. Than Conte was at Juve.So why are you so opposed to the notion that Gallardo would still have to make a big leap and is a relatively unproven quantity?
(I'm more than happy to assume the guy has something about him; but today, like when we previously interacted on the subject you seems appalled by the above thinking.....)
I appreciate that there's no definitive metric, but still.....
So the current champs would finish 8th in the EPL....
You're only further proving my point here.
....Now transpose that difference in level to those cup competitions you were just comparing with the CL & EL. On this basis it seems that it would be kind to me the compare their 'CL' with out 'EL' considering 8th in the EPL doesn't even qualify for Europe.
2 things:
- Let's be straight here; Alvarez is a sub for City.
- Like most players that blossom in Sth,America s it's not long before they are scooped up by big European teams..... This is anything but a testimony to the strength of the Argentinian league itself.
Ooh I don’t know. Only 30 league games left you know… in fairness, I am getting a bit twitchy at how we start slowly and seem to rely on ceding possession and defending. However, on Saturday it was 2 individual mistakes that ended the game as a competitive fixture. We were well in it at half time and were looking the better team
I guess the lazy narrative is "His tactics lost us the game"
Not at all.
We all watched the game. Most of us who understand football know that there was nothing wrong with our tactics today. Lloris' individual error cost us the second goal after we ended the first half the much better team. Perisic, with all his experience, decided to have his worst game in a Spurs shirt and Son was back to pre-Leicetser hattrick performances by not being able to do anything on or off the ball.
Woolwich were always going to come out of the blocks in that game. They've done it all season and they always do it against us at home. Having three in midfield wouldn't have changed that. And it's laughable and lazy to think it would have done.
Woolwich's attacks came from out wide and it's where they looked most dangerous. So why on earth would having a third man in midfield have made a difference?
Yes, we'd all have loved to have seen 352. It's what most of us wanted. But it didn't happen. What did happen is an atrocious refereeing performance that saw Woolwich get away with plenty of yellow card offences and one of our men getting sent off for just that, a yellow card offence. Perisic being passive defensively, Lloris making an error and Son not being able to link up with anything were bigger reasons why we failed to get something from todays game.
Not a lack of a third midfielder.
In fact, if Emerson didn't get sent off, it's more likely we end up getting a point from the game as opposed to losing.
Agree with most of that but Son is becoming a real problem
Shearer highlighted what a poor game he had on MOTD not for the first time this season
I don’t know what’s wrong with him
Like playing with ten men with him in this form offering nothing in attack or defence
Don't twist my words, I didn't say they'd finish 8th, I said they could achieve top 8 with top 6th a real possibility. Those are different things.
I also said that Alvarez CAN start for City (as he has done already multiple times). Again, don't twist my words.
As ever, you always know best. But both Lionel Messi and Pep Guardiola follow that League for a reason and both believe Gallardo is one of the few elite managers on the planet. Barcelona wanted him. But I guess you know better. Like everything.
I seem appalled by the above thinking because you've never watched a River match in your life and keep saying your point is proven.