Not at all....Ive said I want Poch to be given time, but he needs to make some massive changes to his management.
Im not from the school of "everything will be ok with new signings" and "if Levy splashes the cash we will challenge for the title" bollox.
I believe a manager should be able to coach and teach the players he has to do what he needs them to, and failing that, play to their strengths not simply abandon them en masse.
Time will tell, but for me there are concerns which I overlooked in the beginning of his reign when IMO, he was doing a better job.
There is nothing black and white about what Im saying. I think he's a good coach that needs time, but he's also making some very repetative and costly errors of judgement. If you dont see that as a balanced view, Im not sure what you want to hear...perhaps I should say next time:
"Poch made the wrong sub, but I like him. I think he could have rested Mason, but I like Poch. We didnt press enough, but Kane has had a great season. Again, we were sloppy at the back, but Pochs fitness regime is really impressive"
Would that make everyone feel better about me criticising him?
