Who could we get for 40m that is definitely better, and has better upside or long-term value?
I disagree with the idea that "he can't ever justify X fee"- that sort of a judgment wrongly presupposes he would never be capable of justifying the fee with performance and numbers. Maybe he isn't worth it now, but he could be in the future, and there is still more future to make before a decision needs to be made.
I'm not saying he would be the best use of 40m for us with so few guaranteed minutes, but I feel he is more than capable of justifying such a fee generally
Let's stop pretending we know the future of this man is as a failure to justify a relatively small 40m fee.