I'm a Cockney Malteser 👑
It's only us that gets 'done' on any technicalities, so I'm not holding my breath. But I would laugh
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Reading it happened with Everton and United about Tim Howard and nothing was done.It is not West Ham that would get done though, it is only West Brom that could face punishment for having a player that a third party has some form of control over.
Nothing will come of it though
It is not West Ham that would get done though, it is only West Brom that could face punishment for having a player that a third party has some form of control over.
Nothing will come of it though
Not so, West Ham insisted that it was part of the deal if they were to release the player. They asked for it to happen, why would West Brom want that as part of any deal?
West Ham were part of a Gentleman's agreement as were West Brom.The selling party can ask for anything they want, they are within their rights to.
It only becomes a deal when there is a buyer willing to accept the terms of the selling party.
If the buying party agrees to buy a player subject to third party control (in this case tenuously and verbally only , with West Ham for one game) they could be found in breach for having that player registered, not a former employer.
It is West Brom agreeing a permanent contract with a player for which they did not "fully control" that is the offence, not that West Ham asked for the player not to be played in the game between the 2 teams.
League have already basically said, nothing to see here anyway.
The report has only recently been commissioned and as is so typical moves at a snail's pace. But the report which has investigated LLDC should now provide solutions/decisions. Obviously, this is hugely political ever since Johnson got involved, so quite what those decisions and solutions actually look like are anyone guess and no doubt, in reality, will roll on and on for years yet to come, with no responsibility being taken with politicians simply kicking the can as far down the road as they possibly can.A new report from the London Assembly budget and performance committee has warned that the London Stadium, the home of West Ham United, is costing Londoners more than £8M per year to run. If West Ham are relegated to the Championship, this cost could increase by £1.5M.
London Olympic Park risks becoming a ‘derelict, costly disaster’ - New Civil Engineer
How has this not been reviewed and dealt with?
Don’t think it can be appealed after VAR. Ref saw it and made a call in line with the rules. Moan all they like. He should feel fortunate that it was not worse in terms of injuring the player. An appeal needs to show a clear and obvious error. That can’t be the case. The ref asked VAR to check the contact. They recommended he check the monitor and the ref then sent him off. What’s a clear error there ?Soucek out of the game against us for violent conduct sending off.
Blatant elbow today but I bet it gets over turned?