The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Ali Gold. “You are fired !”
Yes I think that could make sense. New board agreed with new investor but not a full buyout is certainly plausible hereA thought on something I never really felt able to articulate well in my reams of Levy Out ramblings:
A full purchaser of the club could just take over and sack Levy on day 1. But selling a minority share means some rich entity sinking a ton of money into Spurs and entrusting it to ENIC.
It always seemed to me that in the sponsor/potential investor community there may have been (and IMO ought to have been) reluctance to hand Daniel Levy control of one's capital.
Could it be that the minority investment/sponsorship demanded that Levy relinquish the chairmanship in order to invest?
Thus, this had to be a step prior to a sale of shareholding precisely because that sale is NOT a majority controlling interest?
You can be removed by the board and still retain your shares.There's obviously some sort of investment or sale happening, there's no way he'd just walk away from his c. 25% ownership.
Which makes sense because essentially we bungled 2 transfers and fell ass backwards into decent backup plans
Levy and Jerry didn't start in the same place, but they wound up in a similar one, as a non-football person operating with way, way too much day-to-day control of a major professional football team using dinosaur personalistic tactics to compete against vastly more sophisticated and modern operations, each within the leader's pride and joy of the most revenue-generating glittering forward thinking stadia on their respective continents.Honestly, I don't think so. When he didn't have a salary cap to contend with he was pretty wild with spending. He and the Niners owners are why the salary cap exists, really. And even with the cap, he invented signing bonuses to circumvent the rules.
Jerry's biggest problem is his ego. Jerry got drunk and fired the most successful head coach in the team's history (Jimmy>Landry) because Jerry wasn't getting all the credit. Literally akin to sacking SAF after the trebel because you were tired of reading his name in the papers.
Jerry was good at manipulating the cap when it was in its infancy and teams weren't hiring Princeton and Yale grads. Once smarter people got involved, his advantage vanished - but his ego won't let him admit that he can't do it himself.
Jerry Jones at Tottenham would be the worst of Boehly (spending to spend, mortgaging tomorrow for today) missed with the worst of Levy (having to be involved with literally everything). We truly might do a Leeds.
I dunno, its worked out well for the Dippers.when an american buys the club the meltdown here will be amazing
you clearly work in the MeeejaGood luck to him and thank you for your 25 years + of service. Under Levy we went from being worth millions to billions. We made the Champions League final, won the Europa league and the League Cup and he masterminded a beautiful world class stadium and training facility. It seems like we are left in a good place. Hopefully the next person to lead the club moves us towards building a competitive team that meets the fan’s complete reasonable expectations of a club of this stature.
I don't really take that statement about shareholding as any indication one way or another.
The statement wasn't written by an intern in the communications department. Its no doubt been reviewed by a dozen people several times. Like I said - they could have left it out if it wasn't meaningful.Don't forget that Amanda Staverly has been in and around the club including being at games for around 6-7 months.
She was the one who got the Newcastle takeover done. This reeks of a massive injection from outside the club, possibly even a buy out.
It's not being reported as that at all. The board have removed him from his seat. He still retains all of his shares.I believe the ownership was always dependent on him being employed by the club and only ever active at the point of a sale.
The way this news is reported would mean he's just given up on c. £1bn.
Unlikely?
I think he chose to step down. He is 60, no youngster. Workaholic by all accounts.
I fail to see the relevance, but yes.Which makes sense because essentially we bungled 2 transfers and fell ass backwards into decent backup plans
inthink it’s unrelated to a takeover. It’s probably more likely now but I think he’s realised for a year he’s done and planned accordinglyYes I think that could make sense. New board agreed with new investor but not a full buyout is certainly plausible here
You thought Airfixx was a prolific poster up til now