I already made fun of you for taking stats based off one game. Here are the passing stats from a whole season.
![]()
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I already made fun of you for taking stats based off one game. Here are the passing stats from a whole season.
![]()
Only stating facts. You cant actually argue with that can you? Claiming I know nothing about the game that I predicted...I predicted what would happen. Specifically stated who would be under pressure and demoralized.
You claiming Rose is amazing after a loss and a draw is fitting. Even talking about MOTM for a friken draw speaks volumes.
Doing victory laps for losses and draws is what Rose brings to a back line. Frank Bruno lovable losers complex.
I've wrongfully called someone out for having an agenda before, but you absolutely have one against Rose. It's out of controlPoch's tactics are press. He went backwards.
Lamela was official MOTM.
What is certain, is that he saved us the point we had. I can't fathom why you can't (or won't) see that unless you have an agenda.It is tedious only if you are in the Rose is a defender camp and watch him jogging around while they work the ball past him that led to Jan getting pulled out of position to lose 2 points. Nobody even mentioned the goal in the Rose thread and it came through his side? If that was Davies derpring around there would be a witch hunt. Our wings were a mess. Especially when they brought on Townsend. Who did a rolly polly in our own box just before Rose inexplicably pushed someone in the box seconds later.
Rose is so mental he injured himself. Screaming at the ref flapping around. You want that maniac in defense? He needs to be creating chaos in their box, not ours.
What is tedious is people IGNORING THAT ROSE DID NOTHING TO DEFEND HIS PATCH FOR THE GOAL. His style of play had us on the back foot. Crossing to them, passing was beyond predicatble and risky.
We are much MUCH more solid at the back without Rose there. It's obvious. Monaco are not Man City and we made them look like they were. If you are sliding in for a last ditch tackle: That makes you a good defender? Nope. If you find yourself one on one, it means your shape is fucked.
Gibbsy;
Wiki poses a great question there which remains unanswered. Why on Gods green earth would you advocate Rose as a winger if he can't shoot, can't pass & can't cross? Surely these are quite important attributes for such a player? What possible good could come from playing someone who can't score or create scoring chances, in a role that demands those abilities? I really don't get what value such a player would add to the team. You are sounding like a madman
Because he is a freak athlete that improved a massive amount in one season. Going from one of the worst to one of the best is worth investing time in.
But he still has that early season streak in him. It can still go either way. He is single hsndeldy capable of losing points for us.
Plus it's fucking obvious Davies is a better fit for Eriksen and jan. I mean laugh away but I said Jan would have active like a smacked arse with how Rose fucks up our flanks flow.
And here we are. You fainting with horror at my suggestions are being faux drama queens. The worse our back line and communication looks when he plays, the louder you all seem to get.
What a total load of bollocks. From your OWN stats which are meant to prove your argument it shows that Rose scores more, assists more, makes more tackles & interceptions, & also wins more duels. He makes more key passes. And you maintain that Davies' 1% higher pass completion conclusively shows Davies to be the better player... Don't get me wrong, I think Davies is a fine player, but your anti Rose blabbering is without any merit at all & has become fanatical. Nobody is "fainting with horror". People are just baffled that you see things the way you do & how you can put forward a set of stats that defeat your whole argument whilst maintaining that it somehow proves your point.Because he is a freak athlete that improved a massive amount in one season. Going from one of the worst to one of the best is worth investing time in.
But he still has that early season streak in him. It can still go either way. He is single hsndeldy capable of losing points for us.
Plus it's fucking obvious Davies is a better fit for Eriksen and jan. I mean laugh away but I said Jan would have active like a smacked arse with how Rose fucks up our flanks flow.
And here we are. You fainting with horror at my suggestions are being faux drama queens. The worse our back line and communication looks when he plays, the louder you all seem to get.
What a total load of bollocks. From your OWN stats which are meant to prove your argument it shows that Rose scores more, assists more, makes more tackles & interceptions, & also wins more duels. He makes more key passes. And you maintain that Davies' 1% higher pass completion conclusively shows Davies to be the better player... Don't get me wrong, I think Davies is a fine player, but your anti Rose blabbering is without any merit at all & has become fanatical. Nobody is "fainting with horror". People are just baffled that you see things the way you do & how you can put forward a set of stats that defeat your whole argument whilst maintaining that it somehow proves your point.
Why soAbsolutely love Danny Rose the player. Fucking despise Danny Rose the thread on TFC.
:llorisserious:
Why? I'm genuinely interested. Does it offend your sensibilities? If you love Rose, get involved. If you don't, don't bleat man.Absolutely love Danny Rose the player. Fucking despise Danny Rose the thread on TFC.
:llorisserious:
A dozen pages of the same thing over and over again. I have gotten involved. I give my opinion and I genuinely enjoy reading others. But this has been overkill and mind numbingly repetitive. I get it Gibbs and Wiki have different opinions. Why not just accept that at this point?Why so
Why? I'm genuinely interested. Does it offend your sensibilities? If you love Rose, get involved. If you don't, don't bleat man.
I won't post anymore because you've said so. Ok?A dozen pages of the same thing over and over again. I have gotten involved. I give my opinion and I genuinely enjoy reading others. But this has been overkill and mind numbingly repetitive. I get it Gibbs and Wiki have different opinions. Why not just accept that at this point?
Yes. And I have the freedom of speech to say that it is boring. And aren't you doing the exact same thing right now? A little Putin telling me what to post. Ehh, comrade?Because they don't? Stop reading if you've had enough - that's pretty Russian is what you've suggested there. This is a forum that allows free speech. Don't need none of your fucked up freedom shit. Jeez.
Fuck off. I'm not telling people to stop posting. I find the TV thread boring as fuck, but I wouldn't tell anyone to stop posting in it. If you don't like this thread, butt out. Control freak.Yes. And I have the freedom of speech to say that it is boring. And aren't you doing the exact same thing right now? A little Putin telling me what to post. Ehh, comrade?
I think that's excellent advice. Thanks for the input. Going to put that plan in action at this very moment.Fuck off. I'm not telling people to stop posting. I find the TV thread boring as fuck, but I wouldn't tell anyone to stop posting in it. If you don't like this thread, butt out. Control freak.
Not sure what you're saying exactly. But I don't think most people here are thick at all. Certainly not you.There was no input. I objected to you bothering to make a post complaining about a thread. Now you're all upset. Sorry it didn't rise to your lofty expectations. Surely you've realised by now that most of us are thick?
What a total load of bollocks. From your OWN stats which are meant to prove your argument it shows that Rose scores more, assists more,..