I just cannot at all see ENIC selling the chunk of the club necessary to generate £600M. That would put the new owner's roughly on par with Levy's, which would honestly shock me.
My interpretation of "minority investors" has always been just that - they want someone who will chip in the extra cash to take them closer to the PSR limit and fund the 10-15% increase in wage:turnover without ENIC having to liquidate funds to inject themselves.
I think we are agreed that the circa 10% to 15% shareholding is not compatible with circa £600m given our joint expectation of the total 'enterprise' value of the club.
The only ways I could square that circle is :
1 The circa £600m somehow comprising both an equity injection and some kind of debt component
2 The investor being prepared to buy into Spurs assets such as property at a value closer to value when built - even though they currently are not and the cash injection from the investor is required to build them.
3 At least part of the equity injection is to be priced at some future time when Spurs value has increased significantly - to what extent an investor is willing to do this is a challenge
........ so as you can tell from the above, I'm struggling to define a deal likely to be acceptable to both Spurs and incoming minority investor which helps bridge the gap between % shareholding and £ cash injection.
I, like you, think that the immediate effect on Spurs investment in playing squad will be significant but more incremental rather than blowing every other club out of the water. But I'm also expecting part of the investment to be into assets owned by Spurs (eg property) which will throw off cash in the future thereby giving a 2nd boost to Spurs investment in playing squad in a couple of years time.
Lets see what actually happens !