I didn't see him say that in his post.No, they aren't. The poster was saying he doesn't want owners like the ones already owning clubs in the premier League.
Maybe he should have said he doesn't want a dictatorship government owning the club.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I didn't see him say that in his post.No, they aren't. The poster was saying he doesn't want owners like the ones already owning clubs in the premier League.
No, it's not.Arent the FFP figures not reflective of money in vs money out?
I.e. we can spend what we make. So overall if we've spent 400 million less than FFP allowed us to, that money has been diverted elsewhere by choice over the last few years.
I think ENIC would have alot more understanding from fans if they sent the extra mile to give poch what he needed before initiating this stadium process
But so long as the fans are happy becauseThings like this used to get on my nerves a bit as it seemed like an obsession. I've wanted them gone for 3 or 4 years as football has outgrown them and they've achieved all they're going too but was always in the 'hope springs eternal' camp. I honestly thought they wouldnt be so stupid to piss away another summer and undermine another new manager. I thought they might wake up but its never going to happen. This is them, there isnt going to be any change in philosophy or plan and people like this are/were right.
I didn't see him say that in his post.
Maybe he should have said he doesn't want a dictatorship government owning the club.
My thoughts as a few days ago.Would you stop following/watching Spurs? I remember you boycotted the World Cup.
This bit I get 1 million per cent.
It's my biggest fear (hyperbole) that we'll get Saudi/Qatar owners.
I boycotted the World Cup, but I can't boycott Spurs, and that would make me a hypocrite.
I maybe many, many things but I do try not to be a hypocrite.
I’m the same bud. I don’t care who owns us and I’m perfectly happy with Middle Eastern money and owners. But I’m of the opinion that the present owners get to the end of the window before I throw my toys out of the pram.It's like the poster the other day that was trying to convince the forum that it was Levy's fault a selection of our fan base boo'd Sanchez last season in the most pathetic, cowardly way possible
If THAT is the the Enic out movement, I want nothing to do with it. Honestly I'd rather have ENIC than ever have to be associated with people who even try to justify that kind of behaviour.
Oh do fuck offSo you want to keep Levy just in case he sells up to Arabs. Some people might see that as being a tad racist.
Bit harsh , I’m very ENIC out & I find some of their actions baffling considering we’re supposed to be a football team . I’ve seen too many glaring missed opportunities , negligence , distain for the fans & plain stupidity but it’s got to the point that nothing really surprises or bothers me , which is a shame . I watch games but part of my love for the club has dwindled.I’m the same bud. I don’t care who owns us and I’m perfectly happy with Middle Eastern money and owners. But I’m of the opinion that the present owners get to the end of the window before I throw my toys out of the pram.
Saying that, it’s not looking good and I’d probably already be Levy Out if it wasn’t for this place. I see the Levy Out mob on here and they are either just really thick in most cases or peddling lies and being slippery cunts. There are one or two exceptions to this, but on the whole it’s a group I look at and think “if they believe a thing, then it can’t be the correct thing to believe in” and I swing back to Levy In.
It’s weird that most of them make up shit to argue their case with, as there is so much out there that’s actual fact that could be used. Very strange behaviour.
But what's wrong with Saudi/Quatari owners to make them the ''worst'' kind?he said "The "worst" kind for me would be the Saudis/Qatar owners." clear as day what he meant mate.
You appear to be saying that all Saudi/Quatri people are xyz. What would be wrong with an honest Saudi or Quatari buisness person owning our football club?Oh do fuck off
The racists were the ones that were happy to watch a bit of footie and not give a fuck about "sticky brown people" **** that were slaves and dying in the building of the stadiums
****
A quote from someone who accused of racism at the time and alleged that I wasn't happy because "sticky brown people" were hosting the tournament.
For clarity, seeing it appears that you know you fucked up and are now trying to move the goalposts, or trying to score t'interweb points.
I do not want any owners from Saudi/Qatar who support those regimes.
The same goes for any other owners from any other countries that have similar regime's.
I am not going to get into a "what about" on different levels of badness.
Slavery, women's rights, and having a law that allows a country to execute gay people is my line.
Are F’in kidding me Levybot?!?!? You talking about morality when Joe Lewis is your majority owner?!?Oh do fuck off
The racists were the ones that were happy to watch a bit of footie and not give a fuck about "sticky brown people" **** that were slaves and dying in the building of the stadiums
****
A quote from someone who accused of racism at the time and alleged that I wasn't happy because "sticky brown people" were hosting the tournament.
For clarity, seeing it appears that you know you fucked up and are now trying to move the goalposts, or trying to score t'interweb points.
I do not want any owners from Saudi/Qatar who support those regimes.
The same goes for any other owners from any other countries that have similar regime's.
I am not going to get into a "what about" on different levels of badness.
Slavery, women's rights, and having a law that allows a country to execute gay people is my line.
I'd accept the Steps consortium at this point.
I honestly don't see a problem with a wealthy Saudi or Quatari buisness person owning our club.
Maybe we should never have a British or American owner because their Governments invaded iraq based on a lie and killed 1000's.
I'd smash Claire from Steps all day long. Lucky her.
Sure but there's nothing wrong with an independently wealthy Saudi or Quatari owner is there?I think there is a clear distinction between being owned by an independently wealthy, possibly unpleasant individual and being owned by literal government ministers from brutal, backwards regimes.
Newcastle’s ownership is “a sovereign instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”. Nobody who loves Tottenham should want the club to be part of the propaganda department for a country that executes people for being gay.