That article is so appalingly pro Levy it's 100% been leaked by the club.

"Any positive representation of the club is clearly LIES"
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
That article is so appalingly pro Levy it's 100% been leaked by the club.

These articles are all very well but surely even the deputy cricket correspondent of The Daily Telegraph should know that even though Levy is the focal point of anything about Spurs he is not the majority owner of the club the final desicion to sell may well not be his.
PS And if there was any serious intention to sell would Levy be appointing a new CEO who was also appointed on to the board of directors , unlike Munn who never got that far up the heirachy and a new manager , last couple of clubs to change owners like Newcastle and Everton immediately installed their own choice of managers.
I think Levy/ENIC are here for another season at least.![]()
Just for the record I'm happy to remain in British (Bahamas) ownership, this century we have appeared in five league cup finals, a champions league final and a europa league final and achieved our highest league position since the sixties, not that shabby.It depends if the investors wanted primary day-to-day control. Levy is the MD of the club, with Vinai the CD, Caldecott effectively the FD I think ('accountant' on companies house). Charrington has come in just as 'Director'.
So, whether it be more investment from ENIC/Tavistock, or some Oligarch, if they just wanted to keep the club ticking over and didn't want to arrest control, they could have an outside influence without actually changing the structure too much.
Realistically, as much as people are hell bent on seeing what they want to, the club is very well run as a football club. The main area for improvement would be in terms of financial competitiveness and/or the way the footballing side is administrated in that sense. It isn't some Mike Ashley situation where we are haemorrhaging money due to being ran like a Sports Direct brand. One of the biggest selling points, despite how much people like to see it otherwise, is the fact the club is well run.
And the least successful period in our history.Just for the record I'm happy to remain in British (Bahamas) ownership, this century we have appeared in five league cup finals, a champions league final and a europa league final and achieved our highest league position since the sixties, not that shabby.
A period where we've been absolutely dominated by our two biggest, traditional rivals. Shocking that our own fans seem happy to accept such mediocrity.
Really, think you need to check the trophy record before 1951.
Changed my vote.
Just for the record I'm happy to remain in British (Bahamas) ownership, this century we have appeared in five league cup finals, a champions league final and a europa league final and achieved our highest league position since the sixties, not that shabby.
A period where we've been absolutely dominated by our two biggest, traditional rivals. Shocking that our own fans seem happy to accept such mediocrity.
We have the fanbase, the location and the potential to be so much better than these last 25 years.
Little wonder Gooners and Chavs chant Pro Daniel Levy songs.
This is before most of us were born it’s hardly relevant in 2025.Really, think you need to check the trophy record before 1951.