Deleted member 148
Guest
We won the NLD against odds so I won't be Levy out until after January.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I understand what you are saying but your point is slightly askew!but it's about the level of risk levy the bean counter will take on. one player for all that money is a different risk than three who are also younger with more upside. i really believe daniel has ptsd from n'dombelly and we're just not doing something like that ever again. and by 'that' i mean, paying enough wages to make him join us over other suitors.
Not defending one side or the other, but the idea that anything is done as a smokescreen is absurd.100% this - we all fucking know the net spend figure is a smokescreen of sheer bollocks for morons. WAGES Daniel thats why we don't compete, we all know it ffs.
For fun, which players should we have bought for £140M and £400kpw wages should we have bought that were, at the time of transaction, considered better players?I honestly think its more about our scouting/recruitment! Enic has spent money and fairly large amounts, but just on the wrong players.
To name a few recent signings....
Johnson 40m+ (120k a week?)
Solanke 60m+ (Same as Johnson?)
Maddison 40m+ (140k?)
All decent players, but no more than that imo.
140m+ with contracts worth close to 400k a week. Surely if we studied our recruitment better, 2 top draw purchases on the same value contracts would give us a better chance of challenging at the top table?
Who honestly thought that a 45m Johnson and a 65m Solanke, along with a 40m+ Maddison were the answer to what we are supposedly aiming for?
Levy knows F-all about football and footballers, so I don't necessarily blame him and Enic. Its the fools who are in charge of identifying new signings who's heads should be on the chopping bloke when acquisitions like these are green lite imo.
If we're just doing pure hindsight bias that seems pretty easy, Palmer and Caicedo.For fun, which players should we have bought for £140M and £400kpw wages should we have bought that were, at the time of transaction, considered better players?
Not saying you're wrong, but it would be a fun exercise.
Then after you....For fun, which players should we have bought for £140M and £400kpw wages should we have bought that were, at the time of transaction, considered better players?
Not saying you're wrong, but it would be a fun exercise.
I see you’re not a fan of all statistics , just those that suit you . You go back 60 years and ignore context relating to your stats , he goes back 15 years and you want context . He is right you really are not very good at thisThey’ve won multiple league titles, champions leagues, f a cups, league cups, super cups in the past 25 years.
I’m not going to try to argue you out of your delusion.
They also went out and addressed problem positions with best in class players.Tbh a lot of credit at liverpool goes to ex ceo ian ayre. Remember him hiring klopp after rodgers left. Hoping our new CEO is forward thinking like that.
He doesn’t go back 15 years. He selects our best 8 years relative to them and focuses on league finishes. Even when we were better on the field, they still spanked us under AVB and won a cup.I see you’re not a fan of all statistics , just those that suit you . You go back 60 years and ignore context relating to your stats , he goes back 15 years and you want context . He is right you really are not very good at this
We are pretty much 30 years of CL money, or massive cash splurges by new owners, behind those who we now, remarkably, are closing in on financially. And the only reason you are able to question the owners for not spending what those bigger, richer teams are spending, is that the owners got us to the level we are now being compared to those teams.I think whatever way its spun the overall point that should be made is with largely similar resources we are very very far behind the other clubs.
With all the other big teams in the Pl you really get the sense that they are doing every single thing possible to make the team that takes to the pitch as good as it can possibly be.
Our lot simply 'try and do what they can'. They make an absolute mockery of our club motto. Its an embarrassment.
They've tried there best, its grown so big but they don't have a clue what there doing anymore.
Said I few times but i fear for frank if its not a good start. Things are going to get extremely toxic if another cycle fails to get off the ground. The club have done nowhere near enough to improve us, its laughable compared to others.
We already have injuries and the seasons not started. Come end of September into october we could be hanging squad wise already through injuries and lack of quality.
Ownership is inadequate for actual football. Its an investment firm and it deals with numbers. Simple as that.
This is an incoherent statement.We are pretty much 30 years of CL money, or massive cash splurges by new owners, behind those who we now, remarkably, are closing in on financially.
We are pretty much 30 years of CL money, or massive cash splurges by new owners, behind those who we now, remarkably, are closing in on financially. And the only reason you are able to question the owners for not spending what those bigger, richer teams are spending, is that the owners got us to the level we are now being compared to those teams.
If I’m racing you in the 1500m and I’m 30 yards behind you at halfway, but just before we cross the finish, I’m right behind you, i was well behind you but am closing in. Didn’t really think this would be the bit that was up for debate.This is an incoherent statement.
If we are 30 years behind them, how can it simultaneously be said we are closing in on them?
The reality is that the only thing between us and literally any other club on earth, between us and becoming the single best football team on the planet, is the ambition to reach out and achieve it. There are approximately 10 clubs for whom that's true, and we're one of them.
He doesn’t go back 15 years. He selects our best 8 years relative to them and focuses on league finishes. Even when we were better on the field, they still spanked us under AVB and won a cup.
If you ACTUALLY go back 15 years, Liverpool have 1 champions league, 2 league titles, 1 FA cup and 3 league cups. We have won the Europa league.
Please tell me who has been more successful.
I’m struggling here because it’s fast becoming not worth my time.
30 years ain't 30 yards mate.If I’m racing you in the 1500m and I’m 30 yards behind you at halfway, but just before we cross the finish, I’m right behind you, i was well behind you but am closing in. Didn’t really think this would be the bit that was up for debate.
Perhaps he's a clownAgain, we finished ahead of them 8 times in 9 years from 2010-2019
You're really just not very good at this.
I was attempting to find an analogy that might help you understand the really simple concept of being behind, but getting closer. I appear to have failed.
Might be worth getting yourI’m struggling here because it’s fast becoming not worth my time.