So, after coming so close yet still so far do you believe he's the right man to take us forward? Can we get over that final hurdle under his guidance or is it time to say a big thank you and look for someone with some fresh ideas?
There's no getting away from the fact that he's done a lot of things extremely well for England, and his record his very good if you concentrate on the results alone. He's certainly got us organized, playing for each other and very difficult to beat. To go through a tournament only conceding two goals, one which was a set piece, that deserves a lot of praise. Especially when you're back line and keeper was supposed to be the weak point of the team.
But on the other hand, clearly he hasn't been able to get the best out of so much talent. The likes of Foden, Sancho, Mount... England have the forward players to create chances against any side in the world, but we actually create so little more often that not. England's main strength should be our attack but it's so often the opposite. Does he even know what his strongest 11 is? I get the impression that he doesn't.
You can't sack someone after making a final. The question is more about whether you believe he is the right man to stay in charge for the next half a dozen or so years., or do you think this tournament will be as good as it gets?
There's no getting away from the fact that he's done a lot of things extremely well for England, and his record his very good if you concentrate on the results alone. He's certainly got us organized, playing for each other and very difficult to beat. To go through a tournament only conceding two goals, one which was a set piece, that deserves a lot of praise. Especially when you're back line and keeper was supposed to be the weak point of the team.
But on the other hand, clearly he hasn't been able to get the best out of so much talent. The likes of Foden, Sancho, Mount... England have the forward players to create chances against any side in the world, but we actually create so little more often that not. England's main strength should be our attack but it's so often the opposite. Does he even know what his strongest 11 is? I get the impression that he doesn't.
You can't sack someone after making a final. The question is more about whether you believe he is the right man to stay in charge for the next half a dozen or so years., or do you think this tournament will be as good as it gets?