In the spurs squad clown?Name strikers that are faster and higher intensity than Kane? Wow that's too difficult. I'm not sure I can do that mate.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
In the spurs squad clown?Name strikers that are faster and higher intensity than Kane? Wow that's too difficult. I'm not sure I can do that mate.
I tell you what. You tell me what i should and ill say it.Right.
So you also would have dropped, subbed off and rotated a peak Kane?
Or you mean our policy was wrong but you would have played Kane every week for 90 minutes anyway
I never said higher than kane. I said name that type of player in our squadName strikers that are faster and higher intensity than Kane? Wow that's too difficult. I'm not sure I can do that mate.
He a striker you trolling dickhead
The only reason your life is relevant is this thread. Let that sink inThe only way Kane stays is because no one wants him
Let that sink in
Hopefully this means he will figure out that Kane can be a very good number 10.Conte: ‘I don’t see a Tottenham team without Harry Kane starting’
Tottenham head coach Antonio Conte does not believe that he would pick a team without Harry Kane in the line-up. Spurs’ squad-building has come under some scrutiny, with Kane nominally the only centre-forward in the side. Kane has also been out of goalscoring form ahead of a busy festive period...theathletic.com
Oh sweet jesusPut PEH as striker and he’d have more goals than Kane this season… oh wait… he’s got more playing DM…
Yeah youre right play him as striker . You and your buddy are the biggest trolling no life wankers ever created. My advice is go find a friend outside your basement.Oh sweet jesus
Should that not be woolwich for lifeLove you too mate
Kane 4 lyfe
I know, I’ve told you I’ve got no lifeThe only reason your life is relevant is this thread. Let that sink in
Or how about I’ll ask you a question, and you try and answer it without contradicting yourself.I tell you what. You tell me what i should and ill say it.
Youre right in every arguement
City offered over 100m - but the lying cunt Levy bottled it1. I do not believe that City only offered 75m for Kane.
2. If Grealish went for 100m then Kane would be more.
3. Levy should have sold Kane for 100m plus, but never worth 150m.
4. Kane’s head was turned.
5. Kane, Sterling and McGuire’s form after Euros all suffered.
6. In Contes judgement I trust for the best for Spurs.
7. If Conte keeps, sells or re positions Kane so be it.
*for Newcastle*Hopefully this means he will figure out that Kane can be a very good number 10.
Hopefully this means he will figure out that Kane can be a very good number 10.
The root cause of the awful style of play for two years is shithouses like Lucas and PEH. Only once they are pushed aside in Jan can we objectively assess Kane’s decline (or not)Exactly - there's a difference between us and the England national team and Man City.
Maybe having Kane would be effective for those teams because they can get away with a striker that just needs to be at the right place at the right time and let others do the hard work. Kane can still do that and he does it well.
But we as a team are not City and England and we're never going to be those type of teams. Our golden years 3-5 years ago was the perfect storm and likely to never happen again.
As you say, we've got all these fast, high intensity type of players, only to be slowed down by our main point of attack and the man closest to the goal. We need a more aggressive, athletic and cerebral striker that can lead the attack.
Agreed - Winks, Bergfraud and Dier tooThe root cause of the awful style of play for two years is shithouses like Lucas and PEH. Only once they are pushed aside in Jan can we objectively assess Kane’s decline (or not)
No fuzzy thinking. I know what i said. I know what i answered. I answered the topic you brought up.People here know what i answered and thats good enough for me. You good sir are a troll. You start a debate and then i practically agree with ye apart from one minor detail and still you try twist peoples words.Or how about I’ll ask you a question, and you try and answer it without contradicting yourself.
You said our policy was wrong, but tried to mock the notion a peak Kane should see rotation.
Before denying that, remember I can just drag the post up.
So quite simply, would you have rotated Kane by signing a top striker or would you have continued with a policy you claim was wrong?
It’s ok to have fuzzy thinking, just own it.
No need to lash out and try and distract from the topic
So, that’s a lot of words but not one word of it is on topic.No fuzzy thinking. I know what i said. I know what i answered. I answered the topic you brought up.People here know what i answered and thats good enough for me. You good sir are a troll. You start a debate and then i practically agree with ye apart from one minor detail and still you try twist peoples words.
At least you admit you are a loser so fair play