Son doesn't need Kane to score, assist and contribute. At all.
Only player that can grab the game by the scruff of the neck on this team. He doesn't need the ball to be served on a silver platter to make a difference.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Only player that can grab the game by the scruff of the neck on this team. He doesn't need the ball to be served on a silver platter to make a difference.
Great performance. Better interview. What a superb guy. He gets it. He really does.
Last edited:
Is it a bold claim to make that he has eclipsed Harry as our most important attacker right now?
He literally played for two in the first half when Harry was off the boil.
Son is the guy who is setting the standard in the attack right now. Not Harry.
Not at all
Just musing here. He may or may not be the greatest player for Spurs (depending on why you support Spurs or for how long) but he’s up there with Gary Mabbutt for the nicest. What a great human being aside from his remarkable ability.
Not at all. We have shown time and time again that we cope without Harry. Sonny makes the difference.
No, it's not. But too many here are writing off what Harry has done for us in the past, now that they've suddenly realised he's actually not one of our own.
But you can definitely say that Son is highly unlikely to be as effective as he was last season without Kane, seeing as Harry set up half of his goals. Our team is better with both in it if they're not so out of form, as Harry has been. Despite what a few plums here say.
49 goal contributions in 55 starts as CF
Yeah, ineffective without Kane....
The thing is, Jose made every go through Kane, so I think it made Son seem less important than he is.
Son had his highest goal and assist total of his career, I am not sure how that made him seem less important than he was.
Beech
KaneDomBadBoy
Both of you need to find something new to argue about.
Perhaps you two disagree on Israel Palestine issue? What about Brexit?
Well Kane was immense for the most part last season, and Son had a great season obviously too, so you can say that it worked. Considering the squad we have it makes sense to build the team around both or one of them.
What do you think? Should we sell Kane for 75 million + add ons In January and really start to build the team around Son? Or is that too much for a player of Kane's caliber?
Both of you need to find something new to argue about.
Perhaps you two disagree on Israel Palestine issue? What about Brexit?
No, that isn’t enough.
We’ve been through this before; their first offer was 75+25; but Fabrizio Romano said informal bid of £130m was made later in window.
They need a striker, and Kane’s poor form is due to his head not being in it (VVD had poor form in his last 4 months at Southampton), he’s still a class player.
Think we can sell him for £120m; perhaps 100 up front with 20 in easily achievable add ons.
Remember when our fans kept insisting Eriksen was worth ~80 million
Better to be realistic and move fast rather than hold off and create a lose/lose/lose situation for all parties.
I am being realistic. If we wanted to sell Kane to City in Jan I think we’d get £100-£120m.
The issue is I doubt Levy would let that happen.
Because everyone says it was Kane feeding him the goals. It’s not wrong but the whole philosophy was get it to Kane. I just think Sonny could carry a team if he was given the chance.