• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Ex-Spurs Player Hugo Lloris

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Yet as far as I can see Hugo didn't ruin anyone's life apart from his own, if he hit someone or killed someone then you have more than a point, he fucked up but quit the OTT false equivalence, you're being far too dramatic.

Like I said, if this is the hill you wish to die on then go right ahead but the argument you're making right now shows your ignorance on the topic.

It's not a false equivalence whatsoever for the reasons I outlined in my last post.

Just because Lloris got lucky enough to avoid killing someone doesn't change the issue at hand.

Also, not sure how you can say it ruined his own life, do you really believe that?

You just want to die on this hill and that's fine, your choice but you look like an apologist, like I have already mentioned.
 
Like I said, if this is the hill you wish to die on then go right ahead but the argument you're making right now shows your ignorance on the topic.

It's not a false equivalence whatsoever for the reasons I outlined in my last post.

Just because Lloris got lucky enough to avoid killing someone doesn't change the issue at hand.

Also, not sure how you can say it ruined his own life, do you really believe that?

Well one crime you go out and premeditate to cause harm and your sole intention is to hurt someone, the other your sole intention is to go out and get intoxicated, the driving is just a by product of that, no-one gets in a car with the actual intention of killing someone.

Massive false equivalence - if Hugo did hit someone then you'll have a different case altogether.

It's why in the eyes of the law drink driving you don't get any jail time as opposed to rape because they're non comparable crimes, it's honestly mind boggling you're even comparing the two things.
 
Well one crime you go out and premeditate to cause harm and your sole intention is to hurt someone, the other your sole intention is to go out and get intoxicated, the driving is just a by product of that, no-one gets in a car with the actual intention of killing someone.

Massive false equivalence - if Hugo did hit someone then you'll have a different case altogether.

It's why in the eyes of the law drink driving you don't get any jail time as opposed to rape because they're non comparable crimes, it's honestly mind boggling you're even comparing the two things.

The Law is quite often an Ass

Especially in this case

Once convicted of drink driving you should get 5yrs imprisonment

But what did we do?

Let him keep the captains armband

Disgraceful and if the Scum had done that we would have been all over them quite rightly
 
Well one crime you go out and premeditate to cause harm and your sole intention is to hurt someone, the other your sole intention is to go out and get intoxicated, the driving is just a by product of that, no-one gets in a car with the actual intention of killing someone.

Massive false equivalence - if Hugo did hit someone then you'll have a different case altogether.

It's why in the eyes of the law drink driving you don't get any jail time as opposed to rape because they're non comparable crimes, it's honestly mind boggling you're even comparing the two things.
Unless Lloris is unaware that drink driving is illegal (doubtful) and can compromise your ability to drive safely (doubtful) then you could argue that it is also premeditated in the sense that he simply doesn't care if harm comes to others and he planned to drive regardless of how unsafe it was, he got into that vehicle KNOWING he could harm others but simply didn't give a shit.

He wasn't slightly drunk, he was puking all over his vehicle and couldn't even walk...come on now.

The very legal definition of premeditated is to plan to commit a crime beforehand, he literally planned to drive home, did he not? Otherwise, he wouldn't have even got into the car, you can literally get charged with first degree murder for drink driving, let us not forget that.

You can literally go to prison just for drink driving, are you not aware of the law? Maybe research before arguing a point? Do you yourself drink and drive?

A byproduct of him drinking and driving is that harm is likely to come to others and unless he is incredibly stupid and unaware of that then he must have known that could have been an outcome.

Also, it isn't a guarantee that someone goes to jail for rape either, even with a guilty verdict. so let's cut the bullshit on that one.

I am not wasting anymore time discussing this with you, like I said before, die on that hill if you want to, I have far better things to do with my day.
 
The Law is quite often an Ass

Especially in this case

Once convicted of drink driving you should get 5yrs imprisonment

But what did we do?

Let him keep the captains armband

Disgraceful and if the Scum had done that we would have been all over them quite rightly
Chill the fudge out, why you have such a bee in your bonnet, did HUGO not respond to your DM ?
Cry Crying GIF by Rhymesayers
 
Unless Lloris is unaware that drink driving is illegal (doubtful) and can compromise your ability to drive safely (doubtful) then you could argue that it is also premeditated in the sense that he simply doesn't care if harm comes to others and he planned to drive regardless of how unsafe it was, he got into that vehicle KNOWING he could harm others but simply didn't give a shit.

He wasn't slightly drunk, he was puking all over his vehicle and couldn't even walk...come on now.

The very legal definition of premeditated is to plan to commit a crime beforehand, he literally planned to drive home, did he not? Otherwise, he wouldn't have even got into the car, you can literally get charged with first degree murder for drink driving, let us not forget that.

You can literally go to prison just for drink driving, are you not aware of the law? Maybe research before arguing a point? Do you yourself drink and drive?

A byproduct of him drinking and driving is that harm is likely to come to others and unless he is incredibly stupid and unaware of that then he must have known that could have been an outcome.

Also, it isn't a guarantee that someone goes to jail for rape either, even with a guilty verdict. so let's cut the bullshit on that one.

I am not wasting anymore time discussing this with you, like I said before, die on that hill if you want to, I have far better things to do with my day.

I wondered why he got banned from SC?

Beginning to realise now!
 
The Law is quite often an Ass

Especially in this case

Once convicted of drink driving you should get 5yrs imprisonment

But what did we do?

Let him keep the captains armband

Disgraceful and if the Scum had done that we would have been all over them quite rightly


Being in charge of a vehicle while above the legal limit or unfit through drink​


You may get:


  • 3 months’ imprisonment
  • up to £2,500 fine
  • a possible driving ban

Driving or attempting to drive while above the legal limit or unfit through drink​


You may get:


  • 6 months’ imprisonment
  • an unlimited fine
  • a driving ban for at least 1 year (3 years if convicted twice in 10 years)
 
Well one crime you go out and premeditate to cause harm and your sole intention is to hurt someone, the other your sole intention is to go out and get intoxicated, the driving is just a by product of that, no-one gets in a car with the actual intention of killing someone.

Massive false equivalence - if Hugo did hit someone then you'll have a different case altogether.

It's why in the eyes of the law drink driving you don't get any jail time as opposed to rape because they're non comparable crimes, it's honestly mind boggling you're even comparing the two things.
only genuine arseholes drink drive. no matter how drunk some people get they wouldnt drive because deep down they know its wrong. doesnt matter how much they drink.

your average person doesnt get drunk and put innocent people in harm's way, only cunts do that.


hes a selfish cunt that deep down doesnt give a fuck about anyone, hes the complete opposite to a leader. you only have to see that silly incompetent look he has on his face after a gaffe to know hes a wally anyway.
 
The Law is quite often an Ass

Especially in this case

Once convicted of drink driving you should get 5yrs imprisonment

But what did we do?

Let him keep the captains armband

Disgraceful and if the Scum had done that we would have been all over them quite rightly

We forgave him, his International manager forgave him, tells you all you need to know about how serious people thought that crime was.
 
only genuine arseholes drink drive. no matter how drunk some people get they wouldnt drive because deep down they know its wrong. doesnt matter how much they drink.

your average person doesnt get drunk and put innocent people in harm's way, only cunts do that.


hes a selfish cunt that deep down doesnt give a fuck about anyone, hes the complete opposite to a leader. you only have to see that silly incompetent look he has on his face after a gaffe to know hes a wally anyway.

I’ve often given my car keys to a pub landlord and got a taxi home

Landlord’s don’t mind at all and happy to let you use their car park

A bit inconvenient the next day picking up the car but absolutely worth it imv
 
Unless Lloris is unaware that drink driving is illegal (doubtful) and can compromise your ability to drive safely (doubtful) then you could argue that it is also premeditated in the sense that he simply doesn't care if harm comes to others and he planned to drive regardless of how unsafe it was, he got into that vehicle KNOWING he could harm others but simply didn't give a shit.

Well no he didn't know shit because he was intoxicated and wasn't thinking straight, which is why the CJS don't perceive it to be as harsh a crime as rape/murder.

He wasn't slightly drunk, he was puking all over his vehicle and couldn't even walk...come on now.

The very legal definition of premeditated is to plan to commit a crime beforehand, he literally planned to drive home, did he not? Otherwise, he wouldn't have even got into the car, you can literally get charged with first degree murder for drink driving, let us not forget that.

Laughable tbh, you're comparing someone who is thinking straight to someone who is not.

You can literally go to prison just for drink driving, are you not aware of the law? Maybe research before arguing a point? Do you yourself drink and drive?

There you go with your false equivalences again, in most cases you get a fine and ban if you're caught drink driving, tell me how that's on the same level as rape where you get a minimum 5 years?

A byproduct of him drinking and driving is that harm is likely to come to others and unless he is incredibly stupid and unaware of that then he must have known that could have been an outcome.

Again, key word 'likely' it's more likely that you won't end up killing anyone.

Deal with facts, not emotions
Also, it isn't a guarantee that someone goes to jail for rape either, even with a guilty verdict. so let's cut the bullshit on that one.

Eh? What are you on about now?

I am not wasting anymore time discussing this with you, like I said before, die on that hill if you want to, I have far better things to do with my day.

Cool, probably for the best.
 
Back
Top