Almost everyone on here wants everyone gone
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers January 2022 - Transfer Window
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Any chance that we go for Van De Beek in january? He could be the missing link for the 3-5-2. He's creative, runs a lot and looking to get a move from United, also we were in a bidding war with United for him, so the interest used to be there from us. If it worked for West Ham last year with Lingard, I can't see why this move wouldn't work for us with Van De Beek, who's a superior player to Lingard.
Overrated player. Would stay away from him.
Mangala from Stuttgart please!
I said back in the heat of summer, that Levy should go to the table with Shitty and work for the best deal. Not refuse to listen. That's not how good negotiation happens
And he should also have been looking at way was available as a replacement at that time and for how much.
All he's done is damage our chances of getting a younger, hungrier player in.
Let's just say he DID accept £80m for Kane. Everyone would probably be spitting venom at that.
But then lets say he spent that £80m in the summer and got both Vlahovic AND Martinez whilst the Italian teams suffered a bit.
We may have had to put a few quid on top, so let's say the net spend was £20m to sell Kane and buy 2 under 25 attackers.
We didn't do that. We now have a player we wont ever get £80m for and doesn't score goals because his heads not right. He's getting older and less valuable all the time.
And on top of that, the 2 players we wanted have got off to fliers in Italy pushing their value AND their appeal up to a point where we're likely out of the race.
All because we were wedded to a number to brag about.
That'd bad business. That's money lost. That's damage to the team and, tbh, it's a bit sad.
Imagine if this isn't Kane sulking and that he's actually struggling. How much would we have laughed if we sold him to City for £80m and he struggled there.
I'm also throwing the £80m around as a minimum, as that's what we believe they offered. A good negotiation doesn't just end there. It goes back and forth, both parties showing there is a deal to be done but they both have to give some wiggle room.
I believe we could have got £100m, maybe more. And we could have really used it to improve the squad.
And that's not hindsight, I said it all summer.
Players aren't objects, forcing them to stay isn't clever
Tottenham had final £76.5m Lautaro Martinez bid 'rejected'
Tottenham boss Nuno Espirito Santo has had a busy summer since settling into the hotseat.
www.express.co.uk
£76.5m bid rejected.
Atlético hit dead end in Dušan Vlahović pursuit
The colchoneros will set their sights on another target.
www.intothecalderon.com
"Club president Rocco Commisso insisted last week he would only consider offers in the region of €100 million for Vlahović,"
So north of £150 for the two and even then Inter opted to keep Martinez.
Stop ignoring the facts of the matter.
You’re right, no one can
we desperately need a left foot CB and kane backup in this market session.
then try to sell doherty and dele alli to begin
then try to sell doherty and dele alli to begin
Don’t think we can be picky with who goes…. Almost everyone has a price (if there is a willing buyer) in Jan
Do you have a career, or are you paid to patrol this forum on a full time basis? Captain sensibleTottenham had final £76.5m Lautaro Martinez bid 'rejected'
Tottenham boss Nuno Espirito Santo has had a busy summer since settling into the hotseat.
£76.5m bid rejected.
Atlético hit dead end in Dušan Vlahović pursuit
The colchoneros will set their sights on another target.
"Club president Rocco Commisso insisted last week he would only consider offers in the region of €100 million for Vlahović,"
So north of £150 for the two and even then Inter opted to keep Martinez.
Stop ignoring the facts of the matter.
100m was never going to buy Vlahovic and Martinez.
75m for Kane would have been a joke. He'd have 15 goals for City by now and everyone would be calling Levy a cunt and rightly so.
PSG wants to get rid of at least 3 of the players mentioned in this tweet in January apparently.
I am a bit shocked that they want rid of Paredes, who is probably their best defensive midfielder not named Veratti. Not to mention part of Messi's Argentina clique.
Heck, Paredes would do a lot for our midfield. A technical defensive midfielder with decent passing range.
The downside to Paredes is that he is apparently on outright silly wages. But if we could convince him to cut them down a bit he would be a fine addition to the midfield.Discount PSG cast-offs, you say?
But, yet another Argie that will fly off to South America at a minute's notice.
Pretty much as soon as the trf window closes in fact.
We have that player, it's Harry Kane. We need a striker that can follow the balls Harry provides. I think because of his loss of pace,Harry is more suited now to a 10 role than a traditional striker.
The cost of having "world class" players.
This is why my heart yearns for Vlahovic. He's not the quickest but any video of him does remind me of the way Kane used to get forward when he was younger (with a little more speed, if my eyes don't deceive me).
He’s also very discussed on this board! :contetellmemore:
