• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers January 2022 - Transfer Window

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Please stop doing this....

Manchester United Soccer GIF by Sporza
Happy World Cup GIF by FIFA
champions league dancing GIF by BT Sport
champions league dancing GIF by BT Sport
 
He didn't say " a no one" he said "no one" which is a bit melodramatic.
I'd be surprised at this juncture if we don't sign Traore

If we pulled a rabbit out of a hat and sold any of the 3 stooges, we could do more.
Yeah I can’t see a really good signing coming in at all. I think 20m type signing or traore as you mention.
I was hoping Newcastle would over pay for someone like dele but I think even they are too wise!
 
I hope L & L, while watching this interview on Lewis' yacht, are not misunderstanding Conte's subtle hint here...


Tick tick tick💣 This don't look good at all. You do not fuck with this man you do not bullshit him. He will walk.
"It's a dream to sign for Tottenham"

Either she doesn't subscribe to interweb or her agent is the bentest of bent fuckers in the business
Different game different club. I have zero idea what the rules are in this world.
 
That link also shows the last 5 years we've net spent 50m more than Liverpool, doubled our annual net spend to 44m, and only been outspent (net) by Arse, Chelsea, City, ManU, Everton.

The last three years - since stadium was completed - only four teams have higher net - Arse (-307m), Villa (227), ManU (321.22), ManC (217) than us (215.4).

Last three years we've almost matched City's net, higher net spent than Liverpool (43m) and Chelsea (75m).


As others have said. Our biggest problem is not how much we spend. Our financial model is pretty normal for the overwhelming majority of clubs in Europe.

It's been how we spend.

We used to be much better at it, the last 5 years we've been pretty bad at it - or to be more accurate, lots of other clubs wised up and got better at it, whilst we simultaneously got worse.

I’d also argue the biggest problem has been we haven’t sold which makes our net spend higher. Liverpool literally paid for Allison and Van Dijk with Coutinho because they weren’t scared to sell their best player at peak value. The on-field net is astronomical and the off-field was neutral. Another reason they are able to do this is because they have a great coach, with a specific system, who works with the board to sign players who fit the system. If you do that, you can spend less than top dollar and develop top players. Meanwhile we’ve had multiple coaches and no consistency in style of play. That said, our scouting and cheapness also sucks.
 
Yeah I can’t see a really good signing coming in at all. I think 20m type signing or traore as you mention.
I was hoping Newcastle would over pay for someone like dele but I think even they are too wise!

Actually, I think Newcastle will have a hard time signing players from premier league clubs. Let's face it, it's very good for all 19 other clubs that they go down.

... oh god, are you going to link to that Womens' team player too?

:contelol:

Absolutely not, I think the womens game needs it's own forum and it should be taken there. Rather talk about Cricket and I fucking hate cricket.
 
Where are these figures coming from?

There is some argument against them, or at least their applicability.
Liverpool and City have only needed minor tweeks to their squad for a few years.
Chelsea seem to sell their deadwood for 3 times mkt value.

transfermarkt. See the link ArcspacE ArcspacE originally quoted.

There is some truth in that teams like City might not have needed to spend huge in the last 3 years, but not Liverpool or anyone else. They needed to spend if they were to maintain a title challenge and didn't and are now out of it, for the second year running. And the same logic can be applied in reverse to some of those teams that outspent us in that ten year period, teams that needed to spend huge to try and stay in the PL, and/or bridge a massive gap to teams like us duking it out for CL places (Everton, AV, Palace, WH etc etc).

Bottom line, we spend OK/good for a normal football model, problem is we haven't spent particularly smart the last few years. And to rub salt in that, others have wised up and improved their recruitment processes.
 
transfermarkt. See the link ArcspacE ArcspacE originally quoted.

There is some truth in that teams like City might not have needed to spend huge in the last 3 years, but not Liverpool or anyone else. They needed to spend if they were to maintain a title challenge and didn't and are now out of it, for the second year running. And the same logic can be applied in reverse to some of those teams that outspent us in that ten year period, teams that needed to spend huge to try and stay in the PL, and/or bridge a massive gap to teams like us duking it out for CL places (Everton, AV, Palace, WH etc etc).

Bottom line, we spend OK/good for a normal football model, problem is we haven't spent particularly smart the last few years. And to rub salt in that, others have wised up and improved their recruitment processes.
Put him on ignore a while ago. the ranting and raving and endless conspiracy theory comments got too much.

I do feel as though potentially, big net spends are being reigned in these days. Teams like Barcelona, who spent the best part of $300,000,000 on Dembele and Countinho and are now crippled, show it's not sustainable nor a guarantee of quality and success.
 
Back
Top