And Mbappe to replace Kane.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
And Mbappe to replace Kane.
Funny thing is we can pretty much spend what we want due to FFP. We have one of the richest owners in football yet act like skint spivs.
False.they just decided some time ago to only spend club money on the club
False.
Correction: they choose to have the club's skyrocketing asset value accrue to their personal capital holding rather than being reinvested in the business like every other peer club.
Of course but it means they can invest in the club, which you note they don't and is my point. And it means we have room to kick on if we want.400m FFP figure doesn't mean there's literally a 400m pot of unspent cash sat there.
We don't have "one of the richest owners in football".......... They're not "acting skint"; they just decided some time ago to only spend club money on the club..... Until last summer when they put 150m in.
Of course but it means they can invest in the club, which you note they don't and is my point.
We do have one of the richest owners in football. Joe Lewis' personal net worth is 5.2 billion plus his share in Tottenham which is 75%.
They actually drew £100m out of £150m. So, contrary to reports, only injected £100m for transfers
Tis' not and I like you anyway...Fair enough......
Usually when people cite that FFP figure they want it to mean available to spend.
vs the likes of City/PSG/NC/Chavs and then the spending power of Man U, RM etc. we're effectively rendered 3rd tier wealth.
It's there invested in the company at this point; if you're claiming it's not been spent yet then fair enough...... Not worth bickering over that aspect of things.
I do agree though. Leicester are a club who have investment from the owner completely at the expense of prudential finance. It is a mess in terms of accounts. I am not calling for a pump without regard to the sound accounting.
Yeah but hasn’t really needed to, sporting has had possession for most of the game so far
Yeah but hasn’t really needed to, sporting has had possession for most of the game so far
The only Chiesa we can attract is Enrico
No they don't, you drama queen...usually when people cite that FFP figure they want it to mean available to spend