I disagreed with it because I'm not pretending to know which manager is better for Spurs, before they manage a full season, or even a match. i'm simply saying it's more appropriate to judge the two after a few seasons.How can you believe this:
But disagree with this:
It’s the exact same principle you wrote and the crux your entire opinion is built on.
Just like Totti, looooooong posts but zero substance and changing with the wind when it suits.
So again, despite what the resume says, how do you know Pardew would not be the ideal manager for Spurs.
And on that basis, would you not be livid if we brought him in? Please explain your opinions here because you are coming unstuck again.
You can’t have a thought process that only counts for Jose and Poch, but it all goes out the window if we were to hire Pardew or Klopp.
Then you would suddenly have a very specific idea about where the club was heading and you would NOT be saying that Klopp might not be right for us despite his past because only his time at Spurs counts.
Fraud
Similar to Mourinho, it's a pragmatic approach.
Here's what you left out of the post you quoted:
I didn't love Mourinho as a hire because I'm not sure it's a good fit. His style doesn't suit Spurs. His way of building a team doesn't really suit Spurs. That doesn't mean, and I haven't said, that he can't/won't be better than Poch.
Never said Mou was a bad hire. Never said I "hated" or even "disliked" the hire. Never pretended to "know" who would be a good fit. I've stated repeatedly that none of that means he won't/can't be successful. Stop conflating my opinion with that of others. Simply said let's wait and see.
And no, I don't think, and have never said, i'd rather continue to qualify and get knocked out of CL than win a trophy/trophies elsewhere.
Last edited: