The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
We did Joe but not on Jose, he would have made Soldado look prolific.
If you say so, but Soldado wasn’t bought as a back-up. I guess we’re all a bit frustrated.We did Joe but not on Jose, he would have made Soldado look prolific.
Because by then Sociedad couldn't bring anyone in and anyway weren't keen on selling to FCB, so they insisted on a sum very close to his buy out clause. Barcelona wanted to pay the €25 million that Sociedad were willing to sell to us forBarcelona apparently rejected him too, in favour of a M’boro reject.
You have no idea what you're talking about, you've made up a narrative to suit yourself, it doesn't correspond to reality tho.That's the problem with blind numbers ... he's managed 90 minutes just three times ... in all he's played just 1,331 minutes, unfit, unreliable, no good? who knows why, but if he can't hack the pace of LaLiga he'd almost certainly be utterly useless in the EPL.
So Jose wanted him, but we didn't buy him cos he's shite?
But they could have paid his buy out clause and just got him. Like they had to do with Braithwaite.Because by then Sociedad couldn't bring anyone in and anyway weren't keen on selling to FCB, so they insisted on a sum very close to his buy out clause. Barcelona wanted to pay the €25 million that Sociedad were willing to sell to us for
Piss off Bill we didn't fuck him over what utter shit .... half the players on the planet would be "fucked over" every transfer window if that was the case.You have no idea what you're talking about, you've made up a narrative to suit yourself, it doesn't correspond to reality tho.
Until we fucked him over he was RS's top scorer at just over a goal every other game. The whole debacle has left a bad taste in a few mouths here between RS and WJ and anyway, in the interim Isak has come into the team and is on fire.
The idea that he's unprolific (or unfit) is utterly ridiculous, he's been RS's top scorer for four years, again with a strike rate of something like 0.47 goals per game
I agree with the first bit. We are looking for a prolific striker who will play second fiddle to Kane when Kane is fit.And the line in the summer no doubt will be “there are no good strikers available for a club like us”
You can make excuses as much as you like but the current situation we are in is a farce
Why do you keep saying Jose wanted him? Jose wanted a "young player with potential for the future" how the feck does he fit that description?So Jose wanted him, but we didn't buy him cos he's shite?
Doesn't sound like the club has much confidence in the manager then does it.
The more likely reason is that we weren't prepared to pay the modest fee required.
It's called not backing the manager.
It's obvious to me both managers would have asked for a forward.
Indeed Poch did, and got Lorente while Jansen was still at the club.
Poch used Lorente quite a lot so I can only think he wanted someone better/ younger otherwise why let Lorente go when Poch wanted a forward(s) to cover Kane or work in tandem with Kane ( Madrid away).
Reading between the lines ,it has to be Levy that is at fault, he won't buy someone out of desperation and looks at every purchase as an investment but sometimes needs must. And I believe he didn't renew Lorente's contract just to save wages and then when we drew a blank in the summer he went back to Lorente but it was too late , he already had an agreement with Napoli.
Well clearly they felt he wasn't worth €70 million (he isn't, but then hardly any player is worth their buy-out clause, as I've explained countless times) but that he was worth €25 million (which I'd say he is, just about, in today's market).But they could have paid his buy out clause and just got him. Like they had to do with Braithwaite.
Maybe they didn’t want to spend a load of money on an average striker, only to bench him when their other strikers were fit again.
Good strategy if you ask me.
Genuine question mateWell clearly they felt he wasn't worth €70 million (he isn't, but then hardly any player is worth their buy-out clause, as I've explained countless times) but that he was worth €25 million (which I'd say he is, just about, in today's market).
No you didnt understand what I meant.
Mourinho's most important need was a striker. But theres other players in his list too for lower priority positions. Levy wont buy one coz they arent cheap. Jose still needs some goalscorers due to losing the best one we have, so he goes further down his list of players and ask we get at least Bergwijn coz he might be useful for a few goals since Levy wont fulfil the squad's number 1 need.
Piss off Bill we didn't fuck him over what utter shit .... half the players on the planet would be "fucked over" every transfer window if that was the case.
Why does he average just 51 minutes a game this season .... is it because RS are walking the league and can take off their prize asset every week? go on you tell us why, he wasn't much better before we 'fucked him over' so is that still on us?
RS top scorer for four years with 46 La Liga goals ... big deal you think 46 goals in 4 seasons is prolific? there are players in the same league with well over 100 goals in four years ....
We dodged a bullet so did everyone else ... move on
Plus maybe up to £10 m signing fee? And £12m - £15m in wages over four years. So that’s us now at around £50m. Brutal money.At the rumoured £22-£26m price tag, Willian Jose would have been anything from our 9-13th highest ever fee paid for a player. The numbers weren't small fry compared to what we and plenty of others fork out, especially for an emerge, knee jerk player.
We haggled all summer for a similar fee for Sessegnon, it's not as if it was a couple of quid for someone we may not have been entirely sold on and someone who wouldn't have had a resale value after his time with us.
Plus maybe up to £10 m signing fee? And £12m - £15m in wages over four years. So that’s us now at around £50m. Brutal money.
Didn’t even consider the HG thing. I think the chances are that he would’ve scored a few goals, but probably doubtful he’d have been the difference between success and failure. Our non HGs have to be of the highest quality.I ain't sure what the fees, wages & singing on etc would be but it would all stack up, not to mention having a player on our books that would make it far harder to bring another nonHG in with quota limitations etc.
If think we should have taken a chance but equally I understand if there are reasons why we didn't,
Didn’t even consider the HG thing. I think the chances are that he would’ve scored a few goals, but probably doubtful he’d have been the difference between success and failure. Our non HGs have to be of the highest quality.
Mate all of what you wrote is pure speculation and in your head. Let's put some facts to you to see what you make of this:
Summer incomings:
Ndombele £54m
Lo Celso £14m loan
Sessegnon £30m
Clarke £10m
January incomings:
Gedson loan £4m
Lo Celso permanent £27m
Bergwijn £27m
£166m worth of incomings in a 2 window period. If money was the issue, what do you make of the £166m we spent?
You also say that the reason we didn't sign a striker is because they were too expensive. Piatek cost LESS than Bergwijn did so I'll ask again, why was that £30m, the same £30m that could have signed Piatek, Samatta, Braithwaite and apparently Willian Jose according to some spent on one of those instead of the Bergwijn & Gedson deals? Clearly the money was there, that's obvious because the money was factually spent.
You know what. You make some good points except for the transfers in the Poch era which is a little irrelevant to Mourinho's need for a striker. Still Im glad you replied instead of that Bangkok wierdo who thinks Levy doesnt have the final say in transfers.Mate all of what you wrote is pure speculation and in your head. Let's put some facts to you to see what you make of this:
Summer incomings:
Ndombele £54m
Lo Celso £14m loan
Sessegnon £30m
Clarke £10m
January incomings:
Gedson loan £4m
Lo Celso permanent £27m
Bergwijn £27m
£166m worth of incomings in a 2 window period. If money was the issue, what do you make of the £166m we spent?
You also say that the reason we didn't sign a striker is because they were too expensive. Piatek cost LESS than Bergwijn did so I'll ask again, why was that £30m, the same £30m that could have signed Piatek, Samatta, Braithwaite and apparently Willian Jose according to some spent on one of those instead of the Bergwijn & Gedson deals? Clearly the money was there, that's obvious because the money was factually spent.