Firstly I want to say that I like you as a poster and despite our very different views on ENIC we haven’t clashed at all on this site.
However, you are taking the pro ENIC rumours as gospel, City offered a pathetic amount of money and we said no. What about Pep’s claims that Levy wouldn’t even pick up the phone to discuss a potential transfer? What about Kane’s gentleman’s agreement with Levy that wasn’t honoured? I’m not saying every rumour against ENIC is true, nor am I saying everything ENIC has ever done has been poor, but there is zero evidence to back up what I said is a “myth” . We should have said beginning of the window Kane is for sale for £120m, clubs have 2 weeks to reach an agreement or he is off the table. If we couldn’t reach a deal then so be it, not having this ordeal drag on into the season. I believe a deal could have been done that was reasonable for all parties.
I appreciate the respectful tone....
I don't honestly see where I'm peddling ANY rumour however; pro-ENIC or otherwise...
Pep said many things including pleading poverty on numerous occasions. The whole affair (Kane's skipping pre-season, the Neville interview, wedding-gate etc.) was clearly set up to destabilise him and get him out as cheap as possible as it was obvious we'd (rightfully) value him highly...... I actually think it was also quite telling that no other clubs names were seriously in the frame.
I can accept the suspicion that City had pushed as high as 100m, but anything beyond that is no different to the speculation/supposition you've just accused me of.
Last edited: