Manchester City v Tottenham Hotspur, 17th April [0-1 AGG]

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

I love the kind of football we play, the philosophy we have as a football club, the fanbase that we have... Watching Spurs brings me more joy (and sometimes sadness) than most other activities. There are plenty of reasons but off the top of my head those are the most important ones. My reasons may not be as convincing as others' but I still consider myself a real fan.

It's a shame... You seem to be missing out on what elevates football from being merely a comparatively dull technical exhibition.

....A world where beating rivals means no more than an average game.

...Are you really THAT much of a purist/connoisseur?
 
Well, it wasn’t Trippier’s fault. Man City was overloading the flank, with De Bruyne and Gundogan plugging into the half spaces between our CB and FB.

Both Trippier and Rose has to tuck in to limit them spaces. Questions has to be asked of our midfield:

1) why wasn’t there any track back to cover these spaces?
2) are we pressing too agressively that we kept getting caught out in defence where City managed to keep overload us time and time again?
3) or if we have to press aggressively as part of our strategy, are we doing it correctly?

Well said.
Everyone blaming the FB's, but everyone knows how City play, overloading wide areas, getting in behind, and Poch just set us up almost as badly to deal with this as he possible could, in a narrow 4121 diamond with a highish line and not pressing cohesively (as per your point 3) .

And, as ever, the stuff about Sissoko ( Hairy Cane Hairy Cane )is bollocks too, he was doing less than Wanyama, offering no protection at all, not offering himself as an option when we had the ball and chasing his tail when we didn't. We conceded 3 goals in 20 minutes with Sissoko on that pitch, 1 in the remaining 55 after he'd gone, with Alli in his place.

It was a crazy, brilliant result, but tactically we were all over the place, and Guardiolas didn't exactly cover himself in tactical glory over the two legs either.
 
We certainly did. Look at how to press the Laporte into making errors. We were pushing up high and pressing them

Sorry, didn't really explain myself, which I have in the post (reply to your other post). I think you made sone good points by the way.

What we had was some players, occasionally pressing aggressively, but not all, and certainly not a lot of the time. Pressing like this is no good unless it's coherent, if it's not it can be worse than not pressing at all.
 
Not really the fault of Sissoko.

We made a switch in formation to 4-4-1-1 after the injury to Sissoko. We have Son and Dele now to cover the flanks but the drawback is we now lack options in counter attacking.

That is the reason why we stop becoming threatening and the goals stop. Eventually, we still cannot stop City from scoring (2 goals) and we were lucky to have scored from a set piece.

Sissoko is still crucial for us. He is our only box-box player, without whom, our counter attacks lack pace and our midfield loses the physicality

No not the fault of Sissoko, but he’s definitely not the vital cog either. Just because we are short of options, doesn’t make Sissoko a good one, and he isn’t. He has poor technique, no vision, no 360 game brain, hampers our ability to play out and therefore, transition incisively (minus the one forward surge per game), and defensively he’s terrible. Big and strong, but again, doesn’t read danger or react particularly quickly or incisively.

He’s fundamentally an athlete doing a footballers job. And one of the reasons we have struggled for fluency and performances all season is a lack of intelligence and alacrity in our midfield
 
Last edited:
No not the fault of Sissoko, but he’s definitely not the vital cog either. Just because we are short of options, doesn’t make Sissoko a good one, and he isn’t. He has poor technique, no vision, no 360 game brain, hampers our ability to play out and therefore, transition incisively (minus the one forward surge per game), and defensively he’s terrible. Big and strong, but again, doesn’t read danger or react particularly quickly or incisively.

He’s fundamentally an athlete doing a footballers job. And one of the reasons we have struggled all season is a lack of intelligence and alacrity in our midfield

Do agree with u to a certain extent. He is a “poor man” version of Yahya Toure but he is the best we have got and his improvement has been immense. Who knows, maybe one day he can be our own version of that midfield lynchpin
 
The majority of humans have a bald forehead unless they’ve been brought up by wolves. Here’s mine covered up with hair. Now let’s see your fizzog. I’m guessing like the jort picture we won’t see the upper half. Come on Arc. You’re always boasting about your physical prowess. Let’s see some evidence. Some chance lol. Now I’m away fishing in Welshpool. You’ll have to take your angst out on someone else this weekend.

HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHA

Deary me, Joe - not the wig photo again. RomanzoCriminale RomanzoCriminale
 
E no that's not what I said. I meant should we have lost I would've been disappointed of course but I would've been proud of the team and taken some solace from our being part of such a classic.

I went nuts when Sonny scored his second and when the Sterling strike was disallowed.
TFFT!
:):):)
 
Milk? In an omelette???

¡Dios santo, qué barbaridad!

Next you'll be telling me it needs bacon and leftover mixed veg

:pochfacepalm:

58.jpg


Isn’t that a pipparade??
 
Back
Top Bottom