Is Tel £10m better than Scarlett ? Is he 20-30 million better etc ? The answer is probably no. So why the club are going after him is beyond me to be honest. Buying potential when you have potential already seems a bit misguided.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Player Mathys Tel
- Thread starter Ulrikacoglou
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
3 goals now. Showed some real promise today. Looks physically suited to the PL and his first touch as a different world to Sonny.
The ball hit him today and then deflected in.
He shouldn't have been taking the penalty in the last game & he nearly fucked that up.
Took his goal against Villa well and has been OK in patchy performances.
He's not great though.
25 million should be as far as we should go; if we bother at all; in my opinion
If he was of any use he’d not have been let go bayern !
Nowhere near worth 50m but still offering much more than Son right now.
That's where we find ourselves.
I'd get him on another season-long loan.
That's where we find ourselves.
I'd get him on another season-long loan.
Erm, I mean he tried and then a ball was kicked in to him and bounced in .. and he's scored a pen and an FA cup goal, but real promise seems to be an exaggeration.
He was probably a bit better than some of the other cloggers up top today, I'll give him that.
Coulda woulda shoulda only in reverse
Start him for the rest of the season and see where we end up.
I’m still at the point of trying to negotiate the fee down but taking him on a permanent.
Want to see more drive to score from him and some more shots from deep.
I mean we started him today and we didn't end up doing great.
I think he's alright and has a bit of potential but I'm really not seeing anything you'd be jumping to pay good money for.
Wouldn't Mikey Moore have had a bit extra to offer?
We didn’t do badly because of him though.
If we are being honest most of our best moves came down his side. Not his fault that Vic, Romero, Spence and Bergvall made the mistakes they did.
Touch, technique, pace, can cross it, dribble it, strong and keeps the ball under pressure. Ruthless mentality.
And he’s scoring goals in a team that is a mess.
Mikey has plenty of time. He’s 17 and physically not really ready for the PL week in week out. Let’s hope we see even more of him next season
He's scored 3 whole goals. One was a penalty and one was kicked at him. You're being very kind by saying he's "scoring goals" because yeah .. objectively true, but also not really that prolifically.
He's mostly been invisible.
For his goal the ball bounced off his shin- it was a fortunate touch, at best.
I'm not against taking him on- but for maybe half the quoted fee.
As you are leading negotiations, see how you go.
You seem to see something in him I fail to, so what size fee would you feel is worth gambling on him?
I’d like to keep him, I like his movement and I think if he settles he will do very well