Could Nagelsmann not just step down and resign from his contract?
We could then pay him a signing-on bonus to compensate him for that.
We could then pay him a signing-on bonus to compensate him for that.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Make him head groundsman then.He's not been sacked (they can't afford to pay him all at once). He's been released of his duties but still under contract. Basically a version of gardening leave.
Levy? Yeah right.Could Nagelsmann not just step down and resign from his contract?
We could then pay him a signing-on bonus to compensate him for that.
So, failing upwards?And logically, his new contract will be worth more than what he is getting at Bayern.
Levy pays Conte 15 Mil a year. why is that so unbelievable?Levy? Yeah right.
Why would he step down from a potential €25M (which is what he is owed by Bayern until the end of his contract).Could Nagelsmann not just step down and resign from his contract?
We could then pay him a signing-on bonus to compensate him for that.
Because he has to pay Conte off and will have to pay Nagelsmann something similar. I don’t believe he’ll pay a signing on fee as well.Levy pays Conte 15 Mil a year. why is that so unbelievable?
He wouldn't get paid that 25m if he took a new contract though?Why would he step down from a potential €25M (which is what he is owed by Bayern until the end of his contract).
Happy to be corrected, but I just don’t see how this is contractually legal?
There is no release clause, as they’ve already released him. He’s also not ‘on the payroll’ at Bayern. They simply have to pay him the full value of the contract. It’s hardly their choice.
What? They are letting him move, they're just not paying his contract up for sacking him. Instead, they'll pay him until he gets a new job. It's common sense for both the club and the manager.What a scummy thing by Bayern. Sack him but don't really sack him. Bring in his replacement but don't let him freely move on.
A team will have to pay a fee to get him. Doesn't sound like they really let him go then.What? They are letting him move, they're just not paying his contract up for sacking him. Instead, they'll pay him until he gets a new job. It's common sense for both the club and the manager.
Of course he wouldn't get paid whatever is left of his contract if he finds a new job.He wouldn't get paid that 25m if he took a new contract though?
He'd be getting paid a better salary at Spurs over that period.
That's only for this season, and I even doubt that that is the case.A team will have to pay a fee to get him. Doesn't sound like they really let him go then.
I expect his contract has clear timeframes on how and when he would be paid out, post sacking. With chunks paid out over a timeframe.What? They are letting him move, they're just not paying his contract up for sacking him. Instead, they'll pay him until he gets a new job. It's common sense for both the club and the manager.
But it would be in Bayerns interest to let him leave so they don't have to continue paying the remainder of his contract.A team will have to pay a fee to get him. Doesn't sound like they really let him go then.
What? They are letting him move, they're just not paying his contract up for sacking him. Instead, they'll pay him until he gets a new job. It's common sense for both the club and the manager.